Identification of Plant Genes Involved in Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation
Home Project Description Data Personnel Annual Research Progress Reports Protocols Reference List Links to Related Projects Site Index		Introduction and Background A. VirB proteins mediate T-DNA transport from Agrobacterium to the plant cell. B. VirD2 and VirE2 mediate nuclear import of T-DNA and T-DNA integration. C. VirF functions in planta and expands the host range of Agrobacterium. Preliminary Results A. Isolation of Arabidopsis mutants that are resistant to Agrobacterium transformation. B. NLS signals of VirD2 and VirE2 proteins are functionally different. C. Identification of AtKAP(alpha), an Arabidopsis protein that recognizes the VirD2 NLS. D. A type 2C protein phosphatase potentiates nuclear import of VirD2 protein. E. Development of in vitro T-DNA integration assays. Relevance Specific Aims A. Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis rat mutants and molecular cloning of RAT genes. B. Identification of Arabidopsis proteins that directly interact with Agrobacterium Vir proteins. C. Identification of Arabidopsis genes induced or repressed during the initial stages of Agrobacterium transformation. D. Biological characterization of Arabidopsis genes involved in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. E. Improvement of agronomically important crops using Arabidopsis genes essential for Agrobacterium infection. Experimental Plan A. Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis rat mutants and cloning of RAT genes. B. Identification of Arabidopsis proteins that directly interact with Agrobacterium Vir proteins in yeast one- and two-hybrid systems. C. Identification of Arabidopsis genes induced or repressed during the initial stages of Agrobacterium transformation. D. Biological characterization of Arabidopsis genes involved in transformation by Agrobacterium. E. Improvement of agronomically important crops using Arabidopsis genes essential for Agrobacterium infection. Timetable Informatics Roles of Participants References The Proposed Project and Current Activities Intellectual Property Management Plan

(Return to top of document)

(Return to top of document)

         A. VirB proteins mediate T-DNA transport from Agrobacterium to the plant cell. Agrobacterium elicits neoplastic growths on many plant species. This genetic transformation is achieved by transporting a single-stranded copy (T-strand) of the bacterial transferred DNA (T-DNA) from the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid into the plant cell followed by integration into the host genome (reviewed in 91). Protein products of the Agrobacterium virB locus form a pilus that has been proposed as a channel through which T-DNA and its cognate proteins presumably are transferred into the host plant cell (30). From the 11 open reading frames of the virB operon (101), one protein, VirB2, encodes a pilin-like protein that resides in both the inner and outer bacterial membranes (92) and represents the major protein species found in the purified pilus preparation (48). Furthermore, VirB2 can form long extracellular filaments (48) potentially directly involved in recognition of the host cell and penetration into its cytoplasm. Besides VirB2, VirB3 and VirB9 associate with the outer bacterial membrane and, thus, may participate in interaction with the host cell.

          B. VirD2 and VirE2 mediate nuclear import of T-DNA and T-DNA integration. Agrobacterium T-DNA is delimited by two 25-bp direct repeats at its ends, the T-DNA borders. The bacterial VirD2 endonuclease cleaves the bottom strand of the T-DNA borders, thereby producing the transferable T-strand (reviewed in 91). While only the wild-type T-DNA carries tumor-inducing genes, any DNA placed between the T-DNA borders will be transported into the plant cell nucleus (reviewed in 105). This lack of sequence specificity implies that a T-DNA molecule itself does not contain specific signals for nuclear import. Instead, this process is likely mediated by two Agrobacterium proteins, VirD2 and VirE2, that are thought to associate directly with the T-strand, forming a transport (T) complex (reviewed in 91). In the T-complex, one molecule of VirD2 becomes covalently attached to the 5' end of the T-strand following cleavage of the T-DNA borders while VirE2, a single-stranded (ss) DNA binding protein (15,19,33,88), is presumed to coat the rest of the ssDNA molecule (reviewed in 14), shaping it into a coiled telephone cord-like structure (16). Our studies showed that VirD2 contains one functional bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) and VirE2 contains two bipartite NLSs (18,20,38,43,44,63).
          To specify the polarity of the T-complex and/or to prevent competition between the single NLS of VirD2 and the NLSs of numerous VirE2 molecules, these signals may interact with different NLS receptors. Indeed, our recent results indicate that the nopaline-type VirE2 NLSs may be plant-specific (35) while the NLS of VirD2 functions both in plant and animal cells (35,77). The role of VirE2 in T-complex nuclear uptake was confirmed directly using microinjection of fluorescently-labeled VirE2-ssDNA complexes into stamen hair cells of Tradescantia virginiana. While fluorescent ssDNA remained in the cell cytoplasm when microinjected alone, it accumulated in the cell nucleus when microinjected in complexes with VirE2 (107).
          Nuclear import of the T-complex culminates with T-DNA integration into the host genome. The mechanism by which T-DNA integration occurs is largely unknown. Unlike other mobile DNA elements such as transposons and retroviruses, T-DNA does not encode enzymatic activities required for integration. Thus, T-DNA insertion into the plant DNA must be mediated by proteins transported from Agrobacterium itself and/or host cell factors. Indeed, both VirD2 and VirE2 proteins of the T-complex have been implicated in the integration process (63,67,72,83,97). Specifically, an amino acid sequence downstream of VirD2 NLS, the omega domain (93), is likely involved in T-DNA integration (63,67). Also, an R to G mutation in the H-R-Y integrase motif of VirD2 decreases the precision but not the efficiency of T-DNA integration in vivo (96). Finally, to complete integration, VirD2 may participate in the ligation of the 5' end of the T-DNA to the genomic DNA in vivo (97). VirE2, on the other hand, is required for integration fidelity of the T-DNA 3' end (83).

(Return to top of document)

         C. VirF functions in planta and expands the host range of Agrobacterium. The presence of a virF locus expands the host range of several Agrobacterium species, e.g. A. tumefaciens and A. vitis (87 and references therein). Interestingly, expression of VirF in transgenic non-host Nicotiana glauca plants makes them susceptible to Agrobacterium (75). In addition, coinoculation experiments demonstrated that VirF is likely transported from Agrobacterium to plant cells during the infection process (71). While these results indicate that the VirF protein may perform an important function within the plant, its role in the infection process is still unknown.
          Considering the importance of Vir proteins in the Agrobacterium transformation process, we have targeted for our research plant factors that are likely to interact with these bacterial proteins .

Line	Transient Transformation a % Root Bundles Showing GUS Staining	Stable Transformation b % Root Bundles Showing ppt-Resistance Tumorigenicity		Probable Function of RAT Genec
Wild-type	92± 6	87± 10	86± 15	-
rat1	22± 4	5± 2	7± 1	arabinogalactan protein
rat3	31± 2	9± 2	10± 4	likely cell wall protein
rat4	10± 4	14± 4	19± 8	cellulose synthase-like protein
rat5	86± 2	15± 5	8± 3	histone H2A
rat6	9± 2	12± 10	16± 5	not sequenced
rat7	18± 10	10± 5	18± 10	unknown
rat8	30± 8	40± 5	36± 5	not sequenced
rat9	20± 4	6± 4	4± 5	unknown
rat10	26± 12	19± 5	3± 4	not sequenced
rat11	24± 4	14± 3	4± 5	not sequenced
rat12	19± 5	10± 5	5± 6	not sequenced
rat13	11± 2	20± 10	5± 8	not sequenced
rat14	13± 1	9± 5	6± 5	unknown
rat15	18± 2	11± 6	13± 5	not sequenced
rat16	28± 7	33± 11	21± 10	not sequenced
rat17	90± 6	20± 12	18± 12	myb-like transcription factor
rat18	88± 5	27± 8	21± 7	not sequenced
rat19	18± 3	9± 4	4± 3	not sequenced
rat20	83± 10	31± 10	10± 6	not sequenced
rat21	20± 8	21± 8	8± 9	not sequenced
rat22	70± 5	29± 15	17± 8	unknown

^a 3 plants for each mutant and >100 root segments for each plant were examined; ^b 5 plants were tested for each mutant and 40 - 50 root bundles were tested for each plant; ^c the proposed gene function is based on sequence homology of cDNA and genomic clones identified by the T-DNA-plant DNA junctions. For further detail, see (65).

         In all but one of the isolated mutants, the rat phenotype co-segregated with the kanamycin-resistance marker on the mutagenic T-DNA. Sixteen of these rat mutants (rat1, 3, 4, 6-16, 19, 21) appeared to be blocked at an early stage of the transformation process because their infection by an Agrobacterium strain carrying T-DNA with a reporter gusA-intron gene resulted in very low levels of transient GUS expression (Table 1), indicating deficiencies in T-DNA transport into the plant cell and/or into its nucleus. In contrast, five of the mutants (rat5, 17, 18, 20, 22) are probably blocked at a late (likely T-DNA integration) step in the transformation process because their infection resulted in a high degree of transient GUS expression but low levels of stable transformation (Table 1).
          To date, we have recovered T-DNA/plant DNA junctions from 9 rat mutants and analyzed the sequence of the plant DNA (Table 1). At least three of the disrupted genes likely play an important role in plant cell wall structure and biosynthesis. The disrupted RAT1 gene encodes an arabinogalactan protein (AGP). We are aware of only one other report of an AGP mutant, reb1 (24). Agrobacterium cells do not attach to roots of rat1 plants either in water or in medium containing sucrose. Thus, the rat1 mutant may lack a plant cell surface component necessary for Agrobacterium to bind. AGP involvement in Agrobacterium infection is supported by our observations that the beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent, which binds to AGPs, inhibited transformation of Arabidopsis root segments by Agrobacterium, whereas the control beta-mannosyl Yariv reagent did not.
        The gene disrupted in the rat4 mutant encodes a cellulose synthase-like (Csl) protein (Table 1). This is, as far as we are aware, the only csl mutant plant identified to date. Csl proteins function as synthases of non-cellulosic polysaccharides (T. Richmond, P. Villand, S. Cutler, and C. Somerville, poster presented at the 9th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research, Madison, WI, 1998). In Arabidopsis, 14 CSL genes were identified by their homology to the cellulose synthase (CELA) multigene family that in turn comprises at least 30 genes (1).
        The rat3 mutation contains a T-DNA insertion in a 600 bp area between two highly homologous genes. The 15 kDa proteins encoded by this two-gene family do not show homology to any genes in the data bases. The proteins have a signal peptide, and also contain a GPI anchor domain in their C-termini. Thus, these proteins are likely targeted to the cell surface. rat3 is deficient in Agrobacterium binding in water, although this deficiency is not so pronounced in medium containing sucrose.
        Among the putative T-DNA integration-deficient mutants are rat5 (a histone H2A mutant) and rat17 (a myb-like transcription factor mutant) (Table 1). RAT5 is one of a five-member histone H2A gene family in Arabidopsis. We have complemented the rat5 mutant with the corresponding histone H2A gene, and are currently conducting complementation tests with rat17.

(Return to top of document)

          B. NLS signals of VirD2 and VirE2 proteins are functionally different. Numerous VirE2 molecules associated with the T-strand likely supply a large number of NLSs (16). Still, the single NLS of VirD2 appears to play a role in the T-complex nuclear import because its specific deletion often reduced tumorigenesis and T-strand nuclear accumulation (67,96,104). We hypothesized that VirE2 and VirD2 NLSs may be functionally distinct, interacting with different receptors within the host plant cell. These differences became apparent in a heterologous animal system after we microinjected fluorescently-tagged nopaline-type VirD2 and VirE2 proteins into 1.5-2 hour-old Drosophila embryos that contained ~6000 nuclei in a syncytium (12).

         Microinjected VirD2 accumulated in Drosophila nuclei (Figure 1A); this nuclear uptake was blocked by free NLS peptide as well as by coinjection of a known nuclear import inhibitor GTPgS (data not shown but see 35). [Note that our microscopic data are confocal optical sections with the plane of focus through the cell nuclei.]. Unlike VirD2, nopaline-type VirE2 remained cytoplasmic in Drosophila embryos (Figure 1B), Xenopus oocytes (35), yeast, and HeLa cells (data not shown). This is in contrast to the efficient nuclear import of VirE2 in different plant species (18). Thus, the complete absence of VirE2 nuclear import in animal cells indicates that the VirE2 NLS may be plant-specific. Interestingly, a single amino acid change in the VirE2 NLS redirected this protein into the cell nuclei of Drosophila embryos and Xenopus oocytes (35).

          C. Identification of AtKAP(alpha), an Arabidopsis protein that recognizes the VirD2 NLS. We began our study of plant factors that interact with the invading T-complex with identification of an Arabidopsis protein that binds the VirD2 NLS. Using a yeast two-hybrid screen (28) with VirD2 as bait, we identified an Arabidopsis cDNA clone, designated AtKAP(alpha) ( Arabidopsis thaliana karyo pherin(alpha), after eliminating the false positives using a non-specific lamin C bait (5) and a VirD2 mutant lacking the NLS (VirD2(delta)NLS, Figure 2). We isolated the full length cDNA of AtKAP(alpha) and confirmed its specific interaction with VirD2 by coimmunoprecipitation (4).
         AtKAP(alpha) cDNA contained a single ORF encoding a protein of 65.6 kDa with 44% identity to yeast Srp1 (4), a member of the karyopherin(alpha) family of proteins that function as NLS receptors (47,53,102). Indeed, AtKAP(alpha) complemented the srp1-31 yeast mutant (4,53) and was shown directly to transport fluorescently-labeled VirD2 into the nuclei of permeabilized yeast cells (4).

          We suggest that, during Agrobacterium infection, AtKAP(alpha) recognizes VirD2 and promotes its nuclear import. Because VirD2 is tightly associated with the T-strand (reviewed in 91) AtKAP(alpha) likely mediates nuclear import of the T-complex as well. Unlike VirD2, VirE2 did not interact with AtKAP(alpha) in the two-hybrid assay (data not shown). Thus, another as yet unidentified plant protein that recognizes VirE2 NLSs may also be involved in T-complex nuclear import. In uninfected plants, AtKA(alpha) may function as a NLS-binding protein mediating transport of cellular nuclear proteins.

(Return to top of document)

          D. A type 2C protein phosphatase potentiates nuclear import of VirD2 protein. We used a yeast two-hybrid system to identify additional host proteins that interact specifically with the NLS region of VirD2 (Tao and Gelvin, in preparation). From a tomato two-hybrid cDNA library, one clone, DIG3, interacted with a VirD2 bait containing the C-terminal bipartite NLS, but did not interact with a bait containing a precise deletion of this signal. DIG3 encodes a Type 2C protein phosphatase (PP2C); we have demonstrated PP2C enzymatic activity of a GST-DIG3 fusion protein. Because the Arabidopsis abi1 mutant (a PP2C mutant) showed increased susceptibility to transformation by Agrobacterium, we suggested that a PP2C is a negative regulator of Agrobacterium transformation.

          When we electroporated a GUS-VirD2 NLS fusion gene into tobacco BY-2 protoplasts, GUS activity localized exclusively to the nucleus in approximately 80% of the cells (Figure 3A). Co-electroporation of the PP2C gene sharply reduced GUS nuclear localization (Figure 3B), indicating that PP2C indeed negatively regulates nuclear trafficking of VirD2. We identified a consensus protein kinase C phosphorylation site on a serine residue (Ser-424) two amino acids upstream of the VirD2 NLS. We detected phosphorylation of Ser-424 both in vitro following incubation with protein kinase C and in vivo in tobacco protoplasts. Alteration of Ser-424 to alanine resulted in decreased nuclear import of a GUS-VirD2 mutant NLS fusion protein in tobacco protoplasts, and decreased tumorigenesis of an Agrobacterium strain containing this mutant VirD2 protein. We thus propose that phosphorylation of the serine residue near the VirD2 NLS potentiates T-complex nuclear import, and that the activity of a plant PP2C decreases VirD2 nuclear import and, hence, transformation by Agrobacterium (Tao and Gelvin, in preparation).

          E. Development of in vitro T-DNA integration assays. In higher eukaryotic organisms such as plants, DNA integration occurs predominantly by illegitimate recombination, i.e., two DNA molecules that do not share extensive homology are joined (60,69,73,85). Illegitimate recombination is also responsible for T-DNA integration into the plant genome during Agrobacterium infection (31,56,57,70,97). The role of bacterial and/or plant factors in this process is still unclear. VirD2 has been shown to cleave the T-DNA border sequence of ssDNA efficiently in vitro as well as to ligate the adjoining DNA strands (40,72). Although VirD2-mediated in vitro cleavage and rejoining reactions are T-DNA border specific, T-DNA integration in vivo is sequence independent (31,56,57,97). To understand better the involvement of host cell factors in the integration process, we (BH) have designed an in vitro assay for ligation of the 5' end of T-DNA to the plant DNA. In this approach, a VirD2-T-DNA complex was formed in vitro and ligated to an artificial target DNA (Figure 4) The VirD2-T-DNA complex was produced by VirD2-dependent cleavage of a 35-mer oligonucleotide containing the border sequence. During this reaction, VirD2 becomes covalently attached to the 5' end of an 8-mer cleavage product via a phosphotyrosine bond (72). The artificial target DNA contained single-stranded and double-stranded regions. The single-stranded part was homologous to the 5' end of the T-DNA to facilitate annealing whereas the double-stranded part was not homologous to the T-DNA, mimicking plant genomic DNA. Integration of the VirD2-T-DNA complex into the target DNA was monitored by the appearance of a radiolabeled 21-mer oligonucleotide (Figure 4).

          In this in vitro system, the sequence-specific integration of the VirD2-T-DNA complex occurred with high efficiency (data not shown but see ref. 106). This is consistent with the previously reported activity of VirD2 in rejoining oligonucleotides containing complementary parts of the border sequence (72). However, VirD2 was unable to mediate ligation to a non-specific target DNA suggesting that plant cell ligases and possibly other factors are required for T-DNA integration. Because a purified plant DNA ligase is not yet available, plant extracts were tested for their ability to ligate T-DNA to plant DNA in vitro. We could detect low activity in extracts from tobacco BY-2 cells and pea shoot apices (data not shown).

undefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedA. Identification and characterization of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis rat mutants and cloning of RAT genesundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined1. Use of existing undefinedundefinedArabidopsis T-DNA insertion collectionsundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda. undefinedundefinedThe Feldmann Collection. One of us (SBG) has initiated a search for undefinedundefinedArabidopsis rat (undefinedundefinedresistant to undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium undefinedundefinedtransformation) mutants (see Preliminary Results). Based on the high incidence of rat mutants found in the T-DNA tagged Feldmann collection (0.7% of the approximately 3,000 mutant lines tested to date), and the number of genes in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis (20,000-30,000), we estimate that a total of 200 to 300 undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes may be involved in the rat phenotype (65). This large number of genes is not without precedent. For example, several laboratories have reported a high frequency of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants hypersensitive to radiation (22,55). Given the complexity of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection (e.g., bacterial binding to the plant cell wall and/or cell membrane and T-DNA transfer, nuclear import, and integration into the plant genome), the large number of plant genes involved in this process makes biological sense. Some of these genes directly participate in the transformation process. For example, RAT1 encodes a cell wall arabinogalactan protein that is required for undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium binding to the root surface (65). RAT5 encodes a histone H2A variant potentially involved in T-DNA integration (Mysore et al., in preparation). Other RAT genes may only indirectly affect undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection. For example, RAT17 encodes a myb-like transcription factor implicated in root development (100). The rat17 mutant is another allele of the caprice mutant. Possibly, disruption of this gene renders plant roots recalcitrant to undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation.undefinedundefined
          Our initial screening of 3,000 mutagenized plants is not a comprehensive analysis of the existing collections of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis T-DNA mutants. First, because the Feldmann collection represents pools of 100 plants, some of the analyzed plants may have been sibs, effectively reducing the number of independent mutants screened. Second, this collection contains about 6,400 individual mutagenized plants, with an average 1.5 independent T-DNA insertions per plant (2), corresponding to approximately 10,000 separate insertion events. Thus, the Feldmann collection does not tag all of the 20,000 to 30,000 undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb. undefinedundefinedUse of Other Collections to Achieve Saturation Mutagenesis. Comprehensive analysis of the host genes involved in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation requires saturation mutagenesis of the undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome. To expand the mutant pool, therefore, we have (or shall soon) obtained three additional collections of T-DNA mutagenized undefinedundefinedArabidopsis plants. The DuPont collection, comprising approximately 7,200 individual members with an average of 1.5 independent T-DNA insertions per plant, is expected to tag 11,000 genes (Tim Caspar, personal communication). The Amasino/Sussman undefinedundefinedArabidopsisT-DNA collection (see attached letter) currently includes approximately 70,000 T3 generation T-DNA "disruption-tagged" lines (that are currently being released for distribution by The Ohio State University undefinedundefinedArabidopsis Stock Center) and will soon include another 70,000 T-DNA "activation-tagged" lines (Rick Amasino, personal communication). Finally, as part of an NSF-funded Plant Genomics Project, Dr. Ray Bressan (Department of Horticulture, Purdue University) is establishing a collection of T-DNA "activation-tagged" undefinedundefinedArabidopsis lines that will be available to us as they are developed (see attached letter).undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedCollectively, these T-DNA-tagged undefinedundefinedArabidopsis collections represent more than 200,000 unique T-DNA insertion events and should saturate the undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome with tagged mutationsundefinedundefined.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined2. rat mutant screening proceduresundefinedundefined
          We plan to continue screening the T-DNA-tagged undefinedundefinedArabidopsis collections for rat mutants as described (65). Based on our experience, one person at full-time effort can easily screen between 3,000 to 4,000 plants per month. This throughput will allow two technicians and several undergraduate students (at Purdue) and one postdoc (at Stony Brook) requested in the proposed budget to screen 200,000 independent mutants from all the available T-DNA insertion collections within a two year period. As mentioned above, this approach identifies rat mutants at the frequency of 0.7% of the screened population. Thus, we are certain that additional screening experiments will identify many new mutants with interesting phenotypes.undefinedundefined
          Technically, the screening procedure involves sterilizing seeds, plating them on a sterile solidified growth medium, and growing the plants for 2-3 weeks to allow development of the roots. The roots are then cut and infected with a teratoma-inducing strain of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium, A208, that reproducibly transforms a very high percentage of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis root segments (64). In the mean time, a shoot from each plant is replanted into sterile solidified medium for re-rooting. The shoots derived from plants whose roots did not develop teratomas are transferred to soil. The progeny of these plants are tested again for transformation by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium, this time using a disarmed nopaline-type strain, GV3101(pCAS1) that efficiently transforms undefinedundefinedArabidopsis, conferring phosphinothricin (ppt)-resistance upon the infected plant. In addition, the mutants are re-tested for their susceptibility to tumorigenesis following infection with the A208 strain. Because we can obtain 50-100 sterile root segments from each plant, we can perform statistical analysis to determine the percentage of roots transformed to these two stable phenotypes (i.e., teratomas and ppt-resistance). While 90% of the wild-type undefinedundefinedArabidopsis root segments are typically transformed (65), the resistant plants should exhibit significantly lower transformation efficiencies. In this approach, plants whose root segments yield less than 10% transformation will be identified as rat mutants and subjected to further analyses.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined3. Which stage of the transformation process is blocked in the rat mutants?undefinedundefined
          Initially, we shall determine whether the identified mutants are blocked at an early or late stage of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation process. To this end, we shall infect sterile root segments of these mutants with undefinedundefinedA. tumefaciens GV3101 containing the T-DNA binary vector pBISN1. pBISN1 (67) carries within its T-DNA a nos-nptII-polyA selectable marker and a gusA-intron gene under the transcriptional control of a "super-promoter" (68). This promoter is extremely active in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis (64), allowing us to detect GUS expression 2 days after infection. Importantly, this assay specifically detects GUS activity within the transformed cells because the intron in the gusA gene prevents GUS expression in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium (52). We shall assay for two types of GUS expression: transient and stable. For transient GUS expression, we shall stain the root segments of the rat mutants and the wild-type parental ecotype with X-gluc at 2 and 5 days after infection. Positive staining indicates that T-DNA has been transferred to the plant, has targeted to the nucleus, and has been converted to a double-stranded form required for transcription. However, transient GUS expression does not necessarily indicate that the T-DNA has integrated into the undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome. We shall continue to grow the root segments for 30 to 40 days on medium containing antibiotics to eliminate undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium, and phytohormones to obtain calli which will then be assayed for stable GUS activity. Note that we are not selecting for tumorigenesis or plant antibiotic or herbicide resistance. We have previously demonstrated that, in such unselected calli, transient GUS activity declines to undetectable levels by 30 to 40 days after infection, whereas stable GUS expression from the integrated T-DNA can still be detected (64). undefinedundefinedThus, undefinedundefinedArabidopsis plants with high levels of transient GUS activity but low or no stable GUS expression will likely represent integration-deficient rat mutants. In contrast, mutants with negligible or low levels of transient GUS expression will represent rat mutations that block early stages of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infectionundefinedundefined.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda. undefinedundefinedIntegration-Deficient rat Mutants. We shall confirm that these rat mutants are T-DNA integration deficient using two experimental approaches. First, we shall infect root segments with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium GV3101 that carries the promoter-trap T-DNA binary vector pKM1 (63) containing a promoterless gusA-intron gene with its 5' end in close proximity to the T-DNA right border. Because this reporter gene expresses only after integration downstream of an active plant promoter, it can be used as a functional marker for an integration event (63). To control for T-DNA transfer and nuclear import that precede integration, pKM1 contains a luc-intron (luciferase) gene under the control of the 35S promoter that is expressed regardless of T-DNA integration. Plants with transient luciferase activity but no GUS staining will be classified as putative T-DNA integration-deficient mutants.undefinedundefined
          Second, we shall generate cell culture lines from the rat mutants that appear to be T-DNA integration-deficient and assay these cells directly for T-DNA integration. To this end, we shall infect undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cell cultures for 2 days with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium GV3101 containing pBISN1 carrying the gusA-intron gene for 2 days, followed by killing the bacteria with antibiotics and continuation of cell growth undefinedundefinedwith no selection for any transformation phenotype for an additional 4-6 weeks. We shall isolate high molecular weight plant DNA, subject it to electrophoresis though a 0.7% agarose gel (without restriction digestion), blot the DNA onto a membrane, and hybridize the blot with a gusA-specific probe. A positive hybridization signal will directly indicate T-DNA integration into rat mutant high molecular weight DNA. To assure that we are not detecting hybridization to DNA from contaminating bacteria, we shall rehybridize the blot with an undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium chromosomal gene (picA; 80, 81); lack of hybridization would indicate the absence of detectable contaminating bacteria. Finally, we shall rehybridize the blot with an undefinedundefinedArabidopsis phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene to assure equal loading of the lanes (64). We shall, of course, be looking for rat mutants that do not contain T-DNA integrated into the plant genome. As a positive control for integration, we shall conduct the same experiments using wild-type cell suspensions. As a negative control, we shall use an undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strain (A136) that contains pBISN1 but lacks a Ti-plasmid (which provides Vir protein functions for T-DNA transfer). We have previously utilized this assay to show that a particular undefinedundefinedArabidopsis ecotype (UE-1) is deficient in T-DNA integration (64) and that a virD2 omega-mutant undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strain is deficient in its ability to integrate T-DNA into the wild-type undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome (63). We shall compare our in vivo and in vitro T-DNA integration results (see below).undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb.undefinedundefinedrat Mutants Blocked at Early Stages of Interaction with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium.undefinedundefined Mutants that show neither transient nor stable GUS expression (nor transformation to the other stable phenotypes of teratomas and ppt-resistance) are blocked at an early stage of the transformation process. We shall first examine these mutants for their ability to bind undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium cells. Briefly, we shall incubate sterile root segments for 24 hours with various concentrations of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium cells in either water or sucrose. The root segments are then gently washed and examined using a microscope with Nomarski optics (64,65). rat plants that still bind bacteria but are resistant to transient (and stable) transformation will be classified as mutants with a block in T-DNA transfer or nuclear import.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined4. Genetic characterization of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis rat mutantsundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda.undefinedundefinedIdentification of Homozygous rat Plants. We shall perform genetic analyses to characterize our mutants further. Generally, we would like to conduct all further analyses on homozygous plants. However, many of the mutants in the Feldmann and DuPont collections are heterozygous for the T-DNA insertion. Thus, we shall first segregate the mutagenic T-DNA to produce homozygous rat plants. To this end, we shall allow the plants to self-fertilize and test roots of the progeny for kanamycin-resistant callus formation. If the plants are homozygous, all progeny should be kanamycin-resistant, i.e. carrying the T-DNA insert. If the mutants segregate kanamycin-sensitive plants, this indicates that they are heterozygous. In this case, we shall test the progeny of the self-pollinated kanamycin-resistant plants to identify homozygous plants.undefinedundefined
          There may be two situations that would complicate our genetic analyses. We may not be able to generate plants that yield only kanamycin-resistant progeny. Especially if the progeny segregate 2:1 kanamycin-resistant:kanamycin-sensitive, this would indicate that the mutation in the homozygous condition is lethal and that kanamycin resistance reflects the dominant phenotype of this gene. We should be able to work with the heterozygote for further analysis, but the genetics would be slightly more complicated than working with the homozygote. Furthermore, it is also possible that even if only kanamycin-resistant progeny are recovered, the plant is not homozygous for one mutagenic T-DNA insertion, but rather that multiple T-DNAs inserted into several independent linkage groups, marking them with the kanamycin-resistance gene. It is likely that only one of these insertions would be in a rat locus. This would make the mutant very difficult to analyze. Such a situation would be uncovered in progeny analysis of crosses of the mutant plant with the wild-type plant. F2 progeny would not segregate 3:1 kanamycin-resistant:kanamycin-sensitive (because kanamycin resistance is a dominant phenotype, they would segregate 15:1 if there were 2 independently segregating mutagenized loci). It may be possible to segregate the two T-DNA inserts from each other and subsequently test for co-segregation of the kanamycin-resistance with the mutant phenotype, but this would be very difficult to do if there were more than two independently segregating mutagenized loci. If such were the situation, we would most likely abandon analysis of the particular mutant.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb.undefinedundefinedDominance/Recessivity and Co-Segregation Tests. Next, we shall cross each of the kanamycin-resistant rat mutant plant (pollen donor) with the kanamycin-sensitive wild-type plant (egg donor). We shall select kanamycin-resistant F1 plants and determine whether the rat phenotype is dominant, semi-dominant, or recessive. In addition, we shall subject F2 progeny of self-pollinated F1 plants to undefinedundefined_X1 analysis to determine whether the rat phenotype results from a single mutation.undefinedundefined
          Finally, we shall analyze the F2 progeny to determine whether the mutagenic T-DNA (represented by kanamycin-resistance) always co-segregates with the mutant phenotype. This analysis is essential because T-DNA insertions frequently do not co-segregate with the mutant phenotype (25,26,42,54,99). In our experience, however, the great majority of rat mutants exhibit co-segregation of the kanamycin resistance and rat phenotypes. Of course, co-segregation should not be taken as a proof that the T-DNA has tagged the gene of interest; rather, merely that the T-DNA has inserted at a position either at or very closely linked to the gene of interest. Ultimately, we shall use genetic complementation of the mutant with the wild-type gene to prove that we have correctly identified the gene involved in the mutant phenotype (see below).undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined5. Molecular cloning of RAT genesundefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda.undefinedundefinedIsolation of T-DNA/Plant DNA Junctions. Once we have established that the T-DNA has tagged or closely linked to the gene responsible for the mutant phenotype, we shall isolate the T-DNA/plant DNA junction. Ken Feldmann designed the T-DNA mutagenizing vector such that T-DNA/plant DNA junctions could be recovered by plasmid rescue (i.e., restriction endonuclease digestion of the mutant plant genomic DNA followed by self-ligation and transformation into a recA-, mcrABC- strain of E. coli). However, in our experience, junction recovery is not as straight-forward as it may seem. This is because most mutants contain multiple T-DNA insertions within a single locus. These insertions can be dimers (tandem or head-to-head) or higher multimers. Thus, there may not be any right (or left) T-DNA/plant DNA junctions. In addition, we have frequently seen bands that, on a genomic Southern blot, would appear to be junctions (i.e., not of the expected size for a tandem or head-to-head T-DNA multimer) but upon recovery and hybridization to wild-type undefinedundefinedArabidopsis DNA show no signal. These bands are merely rearranged T-DNAs. We are well aware of these difficulties and have been able to "work our way through them". Before initiating a junction recovery by plasmid rescue, we always conduct an extensive series of genomic Southern blot analyses to determine the number of T-DNA insertions and the organization of the inserted T-DNA. Although many insertions are complex, we have been able to isolate junction clones using plasmid rescue from all rat mutants with which we have worked. If plasmid rescue fails, we shall use inverse PCR, with one primer just inside the T-DNA border and another within the T-DNA, to rescue junction fragments.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb.undefinedundefinedIsolation of RAT cDNA and Genomic Clones. Once we have obtained the putative junction clone, we shall use it as a probe in Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA from wild-type and mutant plants. If we have isolated a T-DNA junction, we should detect a RFLP between these DNA samples.undefinedundefined
          Next, we shall determine whether any DNA rearrangements have occurred during isolation of the T-DNA junction (in our experience, such rearrangements are common) by comparing the restriction maps of the junction clone and genomic DNA from the mutant. We shall then sequence the junction clone to determine the insertion position of the T-DNA within the plant DNA. We have, so far, always been able to identify the T-DNA/plant DNA junction region. Using the junction clone as a hybridization probe, we shall screen both cDNA and genomic DNA libraries of wild-type undefinedundefinedArabidopsis. In our experience, for all mutants except one, we have been able to identify both cDNA and genomic clones corresponding to the T-DNA/plant DNA junction region. The one exception was a mutant for which we could not directly isolate a cDNA. We later discovered that this was because the T-DNA inserted rather far from the structural gene and the junction clone did not contain the gene sequence. However, we were eventually able to identify the correct cDNA using the genomic DNA clone as a hybridization probe. Another problem with which we have dealt in the past was cloning a member of a multigene family. Specifically, the rat5 mutant represented a T-DNA insertion into a histone H2A gene (Mysore et al., in preparation). Because H2A belongs to a large multigene family, the junction clone hybridized to many different genomic and cDNA clones. To isolate the clone corresponding to the particular H2A gene disrupted by T-DNA insertion, we used a unique plant DNA region in the junction clone upstream of the histone gene as a hybridization probe.undefinedundefined
          Following isolation of rat genomic DNA clones, we shall compare their restriction maps to those of the mutant genomic DNA to assure that no large deletions or rearrangements of the genome occurred during the T-DNA insertion process. A deletion could indicate that the gene of interest was not mutated by the inserted T-DNA, but was rather deleted as a consequence of T-DNA insertion.undefinedundefined
          Finally, we shall sequence the isolated cDNA and genomic RAT clones to confirm that they correspond to the junction region and search various data bases for ORFs and map positions on the undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome (three of the RAT genes that we have cloned so far mapped to sequenced regions of the genome, making subsequent genetic mapping unnecessary). Using data bases, we have been able to assign a likely identity or function to many of the RAT genes isolated in our laboratory (Table 1). However, if a RAT gene has not been previously sequenced and mapped, we shall sequence its cDNA and genomic clones and map it using recombinant inbred lines (51,76). We have been successful in this approach with other rat mutants (Nam and Mysore et al., in preparation; Table 1).undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined6. Complementation of rat mutations by wild-type RAT genes undefinedundefined
          To prove that the identified cDNA represents a RAT gene, we will introduce the isolated wild-type RAT cDNA into the corresponding rat plant and test its ability to rescue the mutant phenotype, i.e., make it susceptible to the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation. Although such complementation analyses would appear to be straight-forward, we foresee two major experimental complications that may have to be resolved.undefinedundefined
          The first potential complication is, how does one genetically transform a mutant plant that was originally identified as transformation deficient? Although all the rat mutants that we have identified to date cannot easily be transformed by infecting cut roots or stems, they are all highly transformable using flower vacuum infiltration. (This result suggests that vacuum infiltration and wound inoculation may use somewhat different transformation mechanisms or are organ-specific; Mysore et al., submitted). Thus, we shall use flower vacuum infiltration to introduce the wild-type RAT genomic or cDNA clones (under the control of the CaMV 35S or "super-promoter") into the mutant plants. The T-DNA binary vectors containing RAT genes will also carry a gene for hygromycin-resistance. We shall select hygromycin-resistant transformants and test them for tumorigenesis using the assays described above. We expect that, because of different expression levels of the wild-type RAT transgene, not all transformants may fully restore the wild-type phenotype. However, restoration to 10-20% tumorigenesis is significant if the original mutant were transformed at the rate of only 0-5% (this is the situation with all rat mutants identified to date). We shall assure that the complementation does not result from "environmental" or "physiological" effects by testing the co-segregation of the restored phenotype with the complementing T-DNA (i.e., hygromycin resistance).undefinedundefined
          The second complication may occur with dominant rat mutations. Complementation may then be difficult if not impossible. In fact, many of the rat mutations that we have identified to date are dominant in the diploid plant. (Because the T-DNA did not insert into the coding regions of the genes, we know that these are not dominant negative mutations). Still, we have been able to complement some of these mutations using strong promoters to drive wild-type RAT gene expression, suggesting that overexpression of the wild-type gene can complement even the apparently dominant rat phenotypes. Thus, we think that many of our rat mutants show a dosage effect upon gene expression, and that half the expression level falls below some critical threshold level of expression (haplo-insufficient mutants).undefinedundefined
          For some RAT genes, the cDNA transgenes may not recreate the particular spatial and/or temporal expression patterns potentially required for the RAT protein function. In such case, we plan to use a native copy of the gene derived from the genomic DNA clone (see above) to rescue the rat phenotype. This genomic fragment is expected to contain the "native regulatory" sequences and recreate the natural expression pattern of this gene. Generally, genomic clones have been used successfully to complement many undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutations (see, for example, 79).undefinedundefined
          Finally, if these conventional approaches fail, we shall use antisense and/or sense-cosuppression technologies (61,66) to inactivate the wild-type RAT gene using the identified cDNA sequences. Recreation of the rat phenotype in the plants transgenic for the antisense or sense-cosuppressing construction will indicate that the cloned gene indeed encodes the RAT function.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined7. Characterization of rat genesundefinedundefined
        Once we have identified genes involved in the rat phenotype, we shall begin investigation of their roles in the transformation process. We predict that we shall identify genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis and structure (deficient in binding), in DNA repair and recombination (deficient in T-DNA integration), and T-DNA nuclear import. Characterization of each rat gene in detail, however, is beyond the scope of this proposal.undefinedundefined
          Note that some genes involved in the interaction with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium may be difficult to identify using the genetic assay for rat mutants because a deficiency in these gene products may be lethal to the plant. We hope to isolate these "essential" genes using the yeast two-hybrid and one-hybrid systems, RNA differential display, and DNA microarrays.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedB. Identification of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis proteins that directly interact with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium Vir proteins in yeast one- and two-hybrid systems undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          In host-pathogen interactions, the infecting microorganism generally does not invent novel metabolic pathways; instead, it usurps existing cellular processes and adapts them for use in its life cycle. Thus, undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium likely employs endogenous plant cell pathways for protein and nucleic acid transport across cellular and nuclear membranes and for integration of T-DNA molecules into the nuclear genome. It may be possible to discover components of these pathways by identifying plant-encoded proteins that directly interact with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium proteins. We shall use two experimental approaches to achieve this goal.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined1. Use of two-hybrid assayundefinedundefined
          As mentioned in the Introduction, VirF, VirB2 (and, possibly, VirB3 and VirB9), VirD2, and VirE2 proteins may function within or in direct contact with the host plant cell. These Vir products, therefore, most likely are recognized by and/or interact with plant cellular proteins. We plan to identify putative VirF-, VirB2-, VirB3-, VirB9-, VirD2-, and VirE2-interacting proteins using the yeast two-hybrid assay for protein-protein interaction (28). To this end, we have constructed two-hybrid vectors that express VirB2, VirD2, and VirE2 fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain. Presently, we are preparing similar constructions for VirF, VirB3, and VirB9 expression. Furthermore, we have also made a two-hybrid cDNA expression library from total seedlings of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis (ecotype Columbia) which comprises 5x106 independent cDNA clones with an average size of 1.5 kbp in the plasmid pGAD424 (Clontech). We have already used this library in a two-hybrid assay to isolate an undefinedundefinedArabidopsis protein, AtKAPalpha, that mediates nuclear import of VirD2 (14). In addition, we have obtained three other two-hybrid undefinedundefinedArabidopsis libraries prepared by the Walker and Theologis laboratories (ARBC stock numbers CD4-10 and CD4-22, respectively) and the Goodman laboratory. undefinedundefined
      We shall screen the various undefinedundefinedArabidopsis two-hybrid libraries with VirF, VirB2, VirB3, VirB9, VirD2, and VirE2 proteins as baits. Each screening process will consist of three steps: (i) growth on a drop-out medium following induction of a selectable gene required for prototrophy; (ii) screening of the resulting colonies for the expression of a reporter enzyme, beta-galactosidase; and (iii) elimination of false-positive clones using non-specific baits (4,5). The identified cDNAs will be sequenced and used as probes to isolate the corresponding full-length clones from standard undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cDNA libraries available in our laboratories (4; Tao and Gelvin, in preparation).undefinedundefined
      We shall test proteins identified in the two-hybrid experiments for the ability to interact with their corresponding ligands using an independent coimmunoprecipitation assay. We have successfully used this approach to characterize the interaction between VirD2 and AtKAPalpha (4). Briefly, we shall clone the identified undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cDNA as well as the ORFs of their respective Vir protein ligands into the vector pGEM7Zf+ and use them as templates for in vitro transcription. Messenger RNAs transcribed with T7 DNA polymerase and capped with 7-methyl-guanosine will be translated in vitro using a wheat germ translation system supplemented with undefinedundefined³⁵S-methionine (4,58). Translation mixtures will be combined and incubated to allow interaction. After incubation, anti-Vir protein antibodies, already available in our laboratories, will be added, followed by addition of a protein A bead slurry and centrifugation. After washing, proteins will be analyzed by SDS PAGE (49) and autoradiography. If the identified plant cDNA represents a specific interactor, its translation product will coprecipitate only with the corresponding Vir protein.undefinedundefined
          The proposed two hybrid experiments are expected to identify genes involved in four different biological processes:undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda. VirF-interacting proteins will likely reveal one molecular mechanism by which undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium host range is determined.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb. VirB-interacting proteins will probably represent host factors involved in docking of the bacterial pilus at the cell surface, penetration of the cell membrane by the pilus and/or transport of the T-complex into the host cell through the VirB channel.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedc. VirD2- and VirE2-interacting factors will include those involved in nuclear import of T-complexes. We have already identified two undefinedundefinedArabidopsis proteins (AtKAP alpha and PP2C) that specifically bind the VirD2 NLS and may mediate and/or regulate its nuclear uptake (4; Tao and Gelvin, in preparation). However, no host proteins that recognize the NLS signals of VirE2 have yet been identified. Isolation of such a VirE2-interacting protein is an especially interesting objective because VirE2 nuclear import is plant-specific (35; see also below).undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedd. Both VirD2 and VirE2 are multifunctional proteins that, in addition to nuclear import, most likely participate in integration of the imported T-DNA (7,63,83,91). Thus, VirD2- and VirE2-interacting proteins likely will include host factors involved in DNA repair and recombination.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedC. Identification of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes induced or repressed during the initial stages of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformationundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          To date, the potential effects of Agrobacterium-plant cell interactions on host gene expression have not been adequately addressed. We are aware of only one report (10) that investigated differences in gene activity following undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation. However, this study described differences in mRNA between potato plants and mature potato crown gall tumors. Here, we propose to identify undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes induced or repressed during the early stages of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection, i.e. from the initial infection up to the integration event. To this end, mRNA will be prepared from uninfected and Agrobacterium-infected undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cell cultures. We have previously shown that 20% to 60% of the plant cells in a suspension culture can be transiently transformed by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium that have been pre-induced with acetosyringone (63; N. Darbinian, L.-Y. Lee, and S. Gelvin, unpublished observations). The infected cells will be first sampled immediately after infection and then at various time periods (e.g. every 6 hours) up to 24 hours when T-DNA integration is thought to occur (63,104). We shall subsequently use three experimental techniques to analyze differential gene expression in these mRNA preparations.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined1. Use of subtraction techniquesundefinedundefined
          We shall construct cDNA subtraction libraries using mRNA from undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cell cultures infected with a "disarmed" undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strain (GV3101) containing the T-DNA binary vector pBISN1 (67), and a similar bacterial strain that contains pBISN1 but lacks vir genes. This latter strain cannot transfer T-DNA, but will act as a "mock-infection" control for non-specific Agrobacterium-induced "stress effects" upon the cell culture. We shall prepare the "infected" cDNA with EcoRI cohesive ends while we shall make the "mock-infected" cDNA blunt-ended. We shall further digest the blunt-ended cDNA preparation with the restriction endonucleases RsaI and AluI, resulting in a large number of small blunt-ended DNA fragments. We shall next mix and anneal the "infected" cDNA preparation with a 50-fold (w/w) excess of the "mock-infected" digested cDNA. We shall use the annealed cDNA inserts to construct a library in an EcoRI-digested vector. The only cDNA clones likely to be inserted into the vector are those sequences that are double-stranded and have EcoRI cohesive ends. These clones are derived from the "infected" cDNA preparation and represent sequences for which no complementary fragments were present in the "mock-infected" cDNA, resulting in a subtraction library enriched for genes induced by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection. To enrich for genes suppressed by the infection, the procedure will be reversed, using "mock-infected" cDNA with EcoRI ends and "infected" cDNA with blunt ends.undefinedundefined
          To identify rare differentially-expressed messages, we plan to utilize a PCR-based procedure routinely used in our laboratory. In this approach, we shall amplify the subtracted cDNAs by two rounds of PCR using a commercially-available PCR-Selectundefinedundefined^� kit (Clontech); this procedure is fast (takes only 3-4 days) and requires small amounts of starting material (0.5-2.0 mu g of polyAundefinedundefined⁺ RNA).undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined2. Use of RNA differential displayundefinedundefined
          Alternatively, we shall perform RT-PCR to display subsets of mRNAs as short DNA bands (50). Such mRNA fingerprinting will allow us to observe alterations in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis gene expression caused by different environmental factors, such as undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection. The resulting DNA fragments of interest can easily be re-amplified, cloned, and sequenced. In addition, these clones can be used as hybridization probes to identify genes from genomic or cDNA libraries.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined3. Use of DNA microarraysundefinedundefined
          We shall produce microarrays of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis EST cDNA clones using the microarrayer at Purdue University (see Facilities statement below). Alternatively, we shall purchase undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cDNA microarray chips from the NSF genomics center at Michigan State University (see attached letter). We shall screen these DNA chips (84) with probes prepared from mRNA from "mock-infected" and Agrobacterium-infected undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cell cultures using the robotic reader in the Biotechnology Facility at Stony Brook, or the microarray reader at the NSF genomics center at Purdue.undefinedundefined
          Of critical importance to this analysis will be the choice of cDNA clones to use for microarray analysis. Obviously, we shall utilize as many different cDNA clones as possible, but we may be limited by the number of cDNAs that we can physically handle and the availability of a "complete" cDNA library. We hope to analyze at least 10,000 different genes. We shall necessarily include genes that we have identified by the rat mutant screening and the yeast one- and two-hybrid analyses described above. We shall also microarray genes (and gene families) that are "related" to those genes identified above. For example, we have identified a specific histone H2A gene as essential for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. We shall therefore include for microarray analysis other histone and chromatin-related genes.undefinedundefined
          In this part of the proposed research, we expect to identify undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes that are either induced or repressed early during the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation process. To focus further on the specificity of this differential gene expression, we shall include the following experimental modifications and controls:undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda. To avoid detecting expression of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis phytohormone response genes contained within a wild-type T-DNA, we shall use a disarmed (non-tumorigenic) undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strain.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb. To control for non-specific mutagenic effects of the integrated T-DNA on host gene expression, we shall use RNA derived from hundreds of thousands of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cultured cells. Our focus on the early stages of the infection should help avoid long term effects of T-DNA integration.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedc. To avoid cross-hybridization with different members of the same multigene family, we shall use PCR-generated microarray sequences that are gene-specific rather than whole cDNAs.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedd. To control for non-specific general stress and defense responses, we shall incubate the "uninfected" control cell cultures with an undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strain that lacks vir genes. This strain thus cannot transfer T-DNA to the plant cells. Any induction or repression of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes resulting from incubation with this "non-infectious" undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strain will therefore not represent a plant response to T-DNA transfer, nuclear targeting, or integration.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedD. Biological characterization of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes involved in transformation by undefinedundefinedAgrobacteriumundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          Elucidation of the biological activity of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes and proteins identified in this research is critical for understanding their role in the process of Agrobacterium-plant cell interactions. Here, we shall address this question using four experimental approaches.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined1. Use of reverse geneticsundefinedundefined
          We shall utilize a reverse genetics approach to investigate undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes that may be involved in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Targets for this investigation will include three categories of genes: (i) Additional members of multigene families for which we have already identified a rat gene by direct screening of T-DNA insertion collections; (ii) Genes identified by the yeast one- and two-hybrid systems that are likely to interact with Vir proteins that are present on the bacterial surface or that are transported into the plant together with the T-complex; (iii) Genes identified by subtraction, differential display, and microarray analyses that are up- or down-regulated specifically upon undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection of plant cells.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda.undefinedundefinedIdentification of rat Mutants in Multigene Families. Krysan et al. (45) recently described a PCR protocol to identify mutants in known gene families found in the Feldmann and DuPont T-DNA insertional mutagenesis collections. Briefly, DNA is amplified from pools of 100 T-DNA mutagenized plants using one primer directed to a T-DNA border and one primer directed to a region of known sequence within the gene of interest. DNA from amplified bands is excised and used as a hybridization probe to demonstrate a RFLP between the wild-type and mutant plants. The pools of 100 plants are divided into 5 pools of 20 plants and the PCR reaction performed again. Once the pool of 20 plants containing the T-DNA insertion has been identified, individual plants are tested.undefinedundefined
          We propose to perform similar analyses to isolate undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants in members of already identified RAT multigene families. To this end, we shall use PCR primers directed against the left and right T-DNA borders (because of T-DNA rearrangements and the generation of head-to-head dimers during T-DNA insertion, it is unpredictable whether a disrupted gene will contain a T-DNA containing both left and right borders, two left borders or two right borders as junctions) and a primer directed to the gene of interest. For example, we have identified a T-DNA insertion mutant (rat4) containing a disrupted CSL gene (Table 1). To determine whether other CSL or related CELA genes are involved in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, we shall design a PCR primer to one of the conserved UDP-glucose binding domains within these genes (74) and identify csl and celA mutants in the various T-DNA insertion collections. We shall subsequently test these mutants for the rat phenotype. Another set of target genes will be the histone H2A gene family. We have already identified a histone H2A variant (rat5) involved in the T-DNA integration process (Mysore et al., in preparation). As we identify other rat mutants in multigene families, we shall target other members of these families for mutagenesis using this reverse genetics approach.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb.undefinedundefinedIdentification of Mutants in genes Isolated Using Yeast One- and Two-Hybrid Systems and Subtraction, Differential Display, and Microarray Analyses. We shall identify additional targets for "reverse genetics" from the yeast one- and two-hybrid experiments. For example, using the two-hybrid system, we have identified an undefinedundefinedArabidopsis AtKAP alpha gene encoding one of the proteins, karyopherin alpha, that participate in T-DNA nuclear import (4). AtKAPalpha (Accession Number U69533) belongs to a multigene family which includes aIMPalpha (Accession Number AF077528) and AtIMPalpha1-4 (Accession Numbers Y14615, Y14616, Y15224, and Y15225, respectively). Potentially, inactivation of AtKAPalpha in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants will not completely block nuclear import but may lead to the development of a specific phenotype. Similarly, we have identified a tomato Type 2C protein phosphatase (PP2C) that is likely involved in regulating nuclear import of T-DNA (Tao et al., in preparation). We shall identify AtKAPalpha and undefinedundefinedArabidopsis PP2C gene "knockouts" and determine their effect on nuclear import of VirD2 using transient expression of GUS-VirD2 constructions (18,38) as well as undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumorigenicity assays (20). Or, undefinedundefinedArabidopsis proteins that interact with the VirB2 pilin protein will likely be involved in bacterial attachment to the plant cell surface. A lower level of expression of this plant protein may result in decreased bacterial attachment (64,65).undefinedundefined
          Finally, we shall isolate undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants in up- or down-regulated genes that we identified using the subtraction hybridization, RNA differential display, and microarray approaches. These genes were identified only as being associated with the early steps of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation process. The reverse genetics approach will indicate whether they are essential for it.undefinedundefined
          We would like to note that we may not be able to identify "knockouts" of genes that are essential for plant growth and development. However, we have already determined that many genes involved in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection belong to multigene families. For example, AtKAPalpha (Accession Number U69533) belongs to a multigene family that includes aIMPalpha (Accession Number AF077528) and AtIMPalpha 1-4 (Accession Numbers Y14615, Y14616, Y15224, and Y15225, respectively). Potentially, individual members of such multigene families are not critical for plant survival but are required for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Furthermore, most of the T-DNA insertion rat mutants isolated to date are not "knockouts" per se because the T-DNA had inserted into the 5' or 3' untranslated regions of the RAT genes. These may therefore represent "knockdown" mutants that express lower levels of the gene products, allowing the plant to survive but not permitting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.undefinedundefined
          Technically, the reverse genetics experiments will be conducted in two ways. We have obtained the Feldmann and DuPont collections and have set up a "reverse genetics" facility at Purdue based upon the approach described above. We shall expand this facility to screen the Bressan collection of T-DNA insertion mutants that is currently being generated at Purdue. Also, we shall take advantage of the screening service that is currently being developed by Dr. Michael Sussman (Univ. of Wisconsin) using the Amasino/Sussman collection of T-DNA insertion mutants. As mentioned above, the combined collections from Feldmann, DuPont, Bressan, and Amasino/Sussman saturate the entire undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome. Thus, the reverse genetics approach proposed here will likely discover mutations in most genes identified in this study.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined2. Use of nuclear import assays undefinedundefined
          VirD2- and VirE2-interactors may be involved in nuclear transport of these undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium proteins and, by implication, the T-complex itself. We shall test this hypothesis four ways:undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda. undefinedundefinedQuantification of Nuclear Import in Plant Protoplasts. We have devised an assay to quantify the extent of nuclear translocation of a GUS-VirD2 NLS fusion protein in tobacco BY-2 protoplasts (Tao and Gelvin, in preparation). This assay can be easily adapted for use in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis protoplasts. Briefly, a gene encoding a nuclear import substrate, i.e., GUS-VirD2 or GUS-VirE2 fusion proteins, is electroporated into protoplasts and the cells are stained with X-gluc 24 hours later. The percentage of cells showing exclusive nuclear localization of GUS activity (usually 80%) is determined. Next, the gene encoding the NLS-interacting protein to be tested is co-electroporated into the cells with the nuclear import substrate gene and the extent of GUS activity localized exclusively in the nucleus is determined. Proteins (such as PP2C described above) having a negative effect upon nuclear localization will lower the percentage of co-transfected cells showing exclusive nuclear localization of GUS activity. Proteins that have a positive effect upon nuclear localization will raise this percentage. Alternatively, we can express an anti-sense construction to genes encoding proteins that positively effect nuclear localization. Such expression should lower the percentage of co-transfected cells showing exclusive nuclear localization of GUS activity.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb.undefinedundefinedBinding to VirE2 NLS. No plant proteins that recognize the VirE2 NLS have been identified to date. To examine whether VirE2-interacting protein(s) specifically recognize its NLS signal, we shall perform in vitro translation and coimmunoprecipitation experiments as described above using VirE2, the VirE2 interactor, and anti-VirE2 antibodies. If the VirE2-interacting protein indeed represents a specific NLS receptor, its translation product will coprecipitate with the wild-type VirE2 protein but not with VirE2 derivatives lacking the functional NLS sequences (18, 20).undefinedundefined
          In addition, we shall use coimmunoprecipitation to examine whether the VirE2 NLS receptor also recognizes the NLSs of VirD2. Although AtKAPa was unable to bind VirE2 (4), it is possible that the VirE2 NLS receptor has a more broad affinity, interacting with both plant-specific (VirE2) and general types (VirD2) of NLS signals. If both VirE2 and VirD2 interact with the VirE2 NLS receptor, the affinity of this interaction will be examined by adding increasing amounts of salt to the immunoprecipitation reactions. The salt concentration required to dissociate protein-protein or protein-DNA complexes is commonly used to estimate binding affinity; usually, dissociation by 0.05-0.2 M of NaCl is considered a low affinity interaction whereas dissociation by salt concentrations of 1.0-1.5 M represents a strong binding (13, 17).undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedc.undefinedundefinedVirE2 nuclear import in Animal and Yeast Cells. We hypothesize that the VirE2 NLSs do not function in animal systems because these cells lack the NLS receptors that recognize the VirE2 nuclear targeting sequences. Thus, we expect that introduction of such receptors into Drosophila embryos or Xenopus oocytes will promote nuclear uptake of VirE2 and VirE2-ssDNA complexes in these cells. To test this notion, the plant NLS receptor found to interact specifically with VirE2 will be mixed with fluorescently-labeled VirE2 protein (or VirE2-ssDNA complexes) and incubated for 15-30 minutes to allow formation of VirE2-NLS receptor complexes. These complexes will then be microinjected into Drosophila embryos or Xenopus oocytes as described (35). Nuclear uptake will confirm that we have identified a plant-specific NLS receptor responsible for VirE2 nuclear import.undefinedundefined
          By analogy with non-plant systems (3,41,47), VirE2 nuclear import may involve general posttranslational modifications (e.g. phosphorylation) of the NLS receptor. These modifications are more likely to occur during protein expression in living cells than immediately after microinjection. Thus, in addition to microinjection, VirE2 protein and its NLS receptor will be coexpressed in yeast cells (4). Following expression, VirE2 nuclear import will be assayed by immunofluorescence using anti-VirE2 antibodies. This approach will expand our original one-hybrid experiments. Here, we will use wild-type VirE2 rather than the mLexA:Gal4:VirE2 fusion as nuclear import substrate and monitor its nuclear accumulation directly by immunofluorescence microscopy.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedd.undefinedundefinedFunctional Study of the Putative VirE2 NLS Receptor In Vitro. Protein microinjection or expression in living cells as an assay for nuclear transport has some limitations. For example, other cytosolic components may interfere with the process of nuclear import, complicating interpretation of the experimental data. The use of an in vitro nuclear import assay circumvents these difficulties (reviewed in 34). Presently, however, no plant experimental system exists in which the role of isolated components of protein nuclear import machinery can be tested in vitro; nuclear import of NLS-containing proteins in permeabilized protoplasts of different plant species has been shown to occur without the addition of plant cytosol (8,36,59). Thus, we plan to use permeabilized yeast cells (86) to examine the function of the purified plant karyopherins in vitro. We have already utilized this system to study AtKAPa (4). Here, we shall perform the assay using the isolated components sufficient to detect nuclear import (102). Specifically, we shall include in the reaction mixture import substrates (i.e. fluorescently labeled VirD2, VirE2 or VirE2-ssDNA complexes), permeabilized yeast cells depleted of their cytosol (86), and the recombinant karyopherin beta and Ran GTPase proteins (both kindly provided by Colin Dingwall, Stony Brook). We shall add the VirE2 NLS receptor to the reaction and monitor and record nuclear uptake with a confocal microscope. We shall further assess the specificity of interaction with the NLS signals using previously generated VirD2 and VirE2 derivatives with mutated NLS sequences (4,18,20,35). We shall purify all tested proteins after overexpression of their cDNAs in E. coli (4,36).undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined3. Use of in vitro integration assaysundefinedundefined
          T-DNA integration is thought to occur by a multistep process including: (i) recognition of partially double-stranded chromosomal breaks in the host DNA by VirD2 covalently attached to the 5' end of the T-DNA, (ii) search for microhomologies within the host genomic DNA by the 3' end of the T-DNA; this reaction may be assisted by VirE2; (iii) trimming of non-homologous DNA ends by cellular exo- and endonucleases, and (iv) joining of the DNA ends by VirD2 with the help of cellular ligases and other protein functions involved in illegitimate recombination (31,57,83,97). In addition, general properties of dynamic chromatin, such as accessible chromatin structure, availability of a nicks, and transient single-stranded regions in the chromosomal DNA, are expected to be required for efficient T-DNA integration.undefinedundefined
          Here, we shall subject extracts from undefinedundefinedArabidopsis rat mutants tentatively characterized as integration defective in the described above genetic and biochemical analyses to two in vitro tests to determine where the multistep process of integration may be impaired.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda. undefinedundefinedIn vitro Integration. This approach, recently developed in one of our laboratories (BH), will test cell free nuclear extracts from young undefinedundefinedArabidopsis seedlings prepared as described for extraction of pea shoot apices or tobacco BY-2 cells (21,90). We shall produce the partially double-stranded undefinedundefinedintegration target by annealing the 5'-radiolabeled 13-mer oligonucleotide 5' TAGCCAAACGTAC 3' to the unlabeled oligonucleotide 5' CTGACTGGGTACGTTTGGC 3' at a molar ratio of 1:1, resulting in the following DNA fragment (* indicates the 5'-end radiolabel):undefinedundefined
undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined4. Intracellular localization studiesundefinedundefined
          Identification and/or characterization of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes and their products by functional assays, e.g. nuclear import and recombination and integration, will likely indicate their possible role in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection. Most likely, these factors will represent VirD2- and VirE2-interacting proteins. In contrast, genes identified in the two-hybrid experiments with VirF and VirB proteins as baits as well as differentially expressed genes may be more recalcitrant to functional characterization.undefinedundefined
          One way to address this problem is to determine the exact intracellular localization of the examined protein in healthy as well as in Agrobacterium-infected undefinedundefinedArabidopsis. This information may provide the first insight into the biological function of the studied protein. For example, proteins localized to the host cell membrane may be involved in recognition of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium, determination of its host range, and/or interaction with the VirB pilus. Cytoplasmic proteins may be involved in transport of the invading T-complex from the VirB channel to the cell nucleus. Nuclear proteins, on the other hand, will likely participate in the integration event. Finally, the use of Agrobacterium-inoculated plants or cell suspensions may even detect potential colocalization of some of the bacterial proteins and/or structures with the identified cellular factors. Although this approach may not definitively determine the biological function of the tested proteins, it will point us in the right direction, allowing us to design future experiments to address directly the role of the identified proteins in the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection process.undefinedundefined
          Technically, we shall use immunoconfocal and immunoelectron microscopy to determine intracellular locations of the tested proteins. For immunoconfocal microscopy, tissue sections will be stained with primary antibodies followed by an inodicarbocyanine (Cy5)-conjugated secondary antibody. Cy5 is excited near 650 nm and fluoresces near 670 nm, circumventing the autofluorescence associated with plant tissues. Although Cy5 cannot be seen well by eye and therefore is unsuitable for conventional fluorescence microscopy, it is excited with Krypton/Argon and Helium/Neon lasers used in confocal microscopy. We have used this approach to immunolocalize turnip vein clearing virus (TVCV) particles in TVCV-infected tobacco plants (32). For immunoelectron microscopy, we shall use a protocol recently developed in our lab (32). Most immunoelectron microscopy techniques significantly compromise cellular membranous structures as well as overall contrast and resolution of the image. Our procedure, based on OsOundefinedundefined₄ post fixation and embedding in Durcupan ACM resin, avoids these flaws but retains full antigenicity of the sample (32).undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedE. Improvement of agronomically important crops using undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes essential for undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infectionundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          Identification and isolation of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes encoding proteins that participate in Agrobacterium-plant cell interactions will set the stage for one of the ultimate goals of all undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium research: The improvement of agronomically and horticulturally important crops by making them susceptible to efficient genetic manipulation using undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium as a gene transfer vector. Conversely, there is a pressing need to genetically modify certain commercial plant species that suffer losses resulting from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection. Important plants to target for crown gall resistance include grape, apple, stone fruits, walnut, rose, and Chrysanthemum (see, for example, 9). Finally, disruption of the predominant mechanism of T-DNA integration by illegitimate recombination may allow us to increase the frequency and/or recovery of genes introduced by homologous recombination. (The use of integration-deficient rat mutants to effect homologous recombination is the subject of a grant to SBG funded by the Consortium for Plant Biotechnology Research. Thus, we shall not include these experiments in this proposal). undefinedundefined
          The first three years of work described in this proposal will focus upon the identification of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes involved in the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation process. However, in the fourth and fifth years we shall make a major effort to apply the knowledge that we have gained for the genetic improvement of important crop species. Although there are numerous agronomically important plant species that are currently recalcitrant to Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation, we shall focus upon maize. We have chosen this species because of its immense agronomic importance, the availability of technology for plant regeneration, and the knowledge that at least some varieties can be transformed by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium. Similarly, we shall focus on grape as a species in which to develop crown gall resistance. We have chosen this species because of the importance of crown gall disease in viticulture, and the availability of an Agrobacterium-based transformation and regeneration system. undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined1. Manipulation of maize to render it more susceptible to transformation by undefinedundefinedAgrobacteriumundefinedundefinedundefinedundefined
          Although Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize has been achieved (39), high-efficiency genetic modification of this species is currently restricted to particular genotypes (especially A188 and crosses that contain A188 as a parent). Many agronomically elite varieties remain recalcitrant to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Furthermore, the increasing evidence suggests that, at least using these maize varieties and transformation protocols, T-DNA integration may be an important block point in the transformation process. Indeed, transient transformation of maize is relatively efficient and has been obtained by many groups (see, e.g., 67,78,89) whereas the stable genetic transformation of maize using undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium has been more problematic. As a starting point to improve the stable transformation of maize, we shall employ two different approaches:undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefineda.undefinedundefinedExpression of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis "Integration-Related" Genes in Maizeundefinedundefined. We shall introduce undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes that we have identified as important for T-DNA integration into the maize genome. We first shall modify genetic regulatory elements associated with these genes to optimize expression in monocots. These modifications will include using promoters that function efficiently in maize (such as the maize ubiquitin or actin promoters, or our "super-promoter" that we have recently determined works well in maize (Kononov et al., in preparation), and a maize adh1 intron that increases gene expression levels in monocots (11). Because the elite varieties of maize that we shall transform are currently recalcitrant to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, we shall use particle bombardment. Previously, one of us (SBG) has contracted with the maize genetic transformation facility at Iowa State University. This facility generated for him several hundred transgenic maize plants using particle bombardment. We shall again utilize this facility to generate maize plants transgenic for undefinedundefinedArabidopsis "integration-related" genes modified for expression in monocots.undefinedundefined
          We shall determine the expression levels of the modified undefinedundefinedArabidopsis transgenes, then conduct Agrobacterium-mediated transformation experiments on lines that express these genes well. We shall compare (using gusA or gfp genes) transient and stable transformation frequencies between the transgenic maize and the non-transgenic parent lines. In some instances, we shall introduce several "integration" genes into the maize genome, either by incorporating multiple genes during bombardment or by crossing maize plants containing different transgenes. We shall correlate stable transformation with the number, type, and expression levels of the "integration" transgenes. undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedb.undefinedundefinedOverexpression of Maize Homologues of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis "Integration-Related" Genes in Maizeundefinedundefined. It is possible that low levels of transgene integration into the maize genome result from low levels of expression of endogenous maize proteins important for integration to occur. We shall therefore first identify maize homologues (from the better-transformable cultivar A188) of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes required for T-DNA integration into the undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome. We shall next examine the expression levels of these genes, especially in cells and tissues (such as scutellar cells; 39) that are readily transformed by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium in the maize cultivar A188. We shall clone these genes from maize, then put them under the genetic control of promoters that express strongly in monocots. Finally, we shall introduce these modified putative maize "integration-related" genes into elite varieties of corn using particle bombardment. We shall subsequently determine and correlate the expression levels of these genes in scutellar tissue with the Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation frequency of these tissues.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefined2. Manipulation of the grape genome to prevent crown gall diseaseundefinedundefined
          Crown gall is an important disease with major economic consequences for the viticulture industry. There is currently no adequate prevention of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium vitis infection, nor cure for infected plants and vineyards (9). Therefore, grape remains a major target species for developing crown gall resistance. We shall utilize the information gained in our undefinedundefinedArabidopsis studies to develop crown gall-resistant grape. There are several possible steps in the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation process that could possibly be blocked to prevent crown gall disease. These include bacterial attachment, T-DNA nuclear targeting, and T-DNA integration. Because inhibition of the nuclear targeting and integration steps may present detrimental side-effects to plant growth and development, we shall first target bacterial attachment. Also, we believe that the earlier the infection process can be blocked, the more likely it is to be effective.undefinedundefined
          We have already determined that several key cell wall enzymes and structural proteins are important for undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium attachment to the plant cell surface. Among the structural proteins essential for attachment are an arabinogalactan protein (AGP) that is disrupted in the undefinedundefinedArabidopsis rat1 mutant. However, homozygous rat1 mutant plants appear normal in growth and development (Nam et al., in preparation). We shall therefore identify grape homologues of this arabinogalactan protein and target them using anti-sense or co-suppression methodologies. Dr. Tom Burr's laboratory has recently developed efficient grape rootstock transformation technology (Tom Burr, personal communication). We shall work with Dr. Burr's group to develop grape plants with lowered levels of this specific AGP. We shall quantify AGP expression and accumulation levels and correlate this with bacterial attachment and tumorigenesis-susceptibility. As we identify other undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes involved in bacterial attachment, we shall use their homologues as targets for gene disruption in grape.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

Begin genetic assays for rat mutants, identification of differentially expressed genes in Agrobacterium-infected undefinedundefinedArabidopsis, and reverse genetics experiments using AtKAPa, histone H2A, AGP, CELA, and CSL genes. Complete screening of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cDNA libraries using the one- and two-hybrid approaches. Start in vitro integration work. undefinedundefined

Complete identification of differentially expressed genes and isolation of rat mutants. Begin biological characterization of the identified genes and proteins and cloning of RAT genes. Continue integration and reverse genetics work with newly identified undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes.undefinedundefined

Complete reverse genetics experiments, integration work, and RAT gene cloning. Continue biological assays. At this stage, we expect to obtain enough undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes involved in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection to allow us to begin using these data for crop improvement. undefinedundefined

Complete biological assays. Begin experiments to improve Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize and to generate crown gall-resistant grape.

Complete improvement of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of maize and the generation of crown gall-resistant grape.

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

1. Arioli, T., L. Peng, A.S. Betzner, J. Burn, W. Wittke, W. Herth, C. Camilleri, H. Hofte, J. Plazinski, R. Birch, A. Cork, J. Glover, J. Redmond, and R.E. Williamson. 1998. Molecular analysis of cellulose biosynthesis in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis.undefinedundefinedScience 279: 672-673.undefinedundefined
2. Azpiroz-Leehan, R. and K.A. Feldmann. 1997. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis: Going back and forth. undefinedundefinedTIG 13: 152-156.undefinedundefined
3. Azuma, Y., M.M. Tabb, L. Vu, and M. Nomura. 1995. Isolation of a yeast protein kinase that is activated by the protein encoded by SRP1 (Srp1p) and phosphorylates Srp1p complexed with nuclear localization peptides. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 5159-5163.undefinedundefined
4. Ballas, N., and V. Citovsky. 1997. Nuclear localization signal binding protein from undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mediates nuclear import of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirD2 protein. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 94: 10723-10728.undefinedundefined
5. Bartel, P., C. Chien, R. Sternglanz, and S. Fields. 1993. Elimination of false positives that arise in using the two-hybrid system. undefinedundefinedBioTechniques 14: 920-924.undefinedundefined
6. Baumann, P., and S.C West. 1998. DNA end-joining catalyzed by human cell-free extracts. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 14066-14070.undefinedundefined
7. Bravo-Angel, A.M., B. Hohn, and B. Tinland. 1997. The omega sequence of VirD2 is important but not essential for efficient transfer of T-DNA by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedMol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 11: 57-63.undefinedundefined
8. Broder, Y.C, A. Stanhill, N. Zakai, A. Friedler, C. Gilon, and A. Loyter. 1997. Translocation of NLS-BSA conjugates into nuclei of permeabilized mammalian cells can be supported by protoplast extract: an experimental system for studying plant cytosolic factors involved in nuclear import. undefinedundefinedFEBS Lett. 412: 535-539.undefinedundefined
9. Burr, T.J., C. Bazzi, S. Sule, and L. Otten. 1998. Crown gall of grape: Biology of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium vitis and the development of disease control strategies. undefinedundefinedPlant Disease 82: 1288-1297.undefinedundefined
10. Burrell, M.M., S. Temple, and G. Ooms. 1986. Changes in translatable poly(A)RNA from differentiated potato tissues transformed with shoot-inducing Ti TL-DNA of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedPlant Mol. Biol. 6: 213-222.undefinedundefined
11. Callis, J., M. Fromm, and V. Walbot. 1987. Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells. undefinedundefinedGenes. Devel. 1: 1183-1200.undefinedundefined
12. Campos-Ortega, J.A. and V. Hartenstein. 1985. undefinedundefinedThe embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.undefinedundefined
13. Chase, J.W. and K.R. Williams. 1986. Single-stranded DNA binding proteins required for DNA replication. undefinedundefinedAnnu. Rev. Biochem. 55: 103-136.undefinedundefined
14. Citovsky, V. 1993. Probing plasmodesmal transport with plant viruses. undefinedundefinedPlant Physiol. 102: 1071-1076.undefinedundefined
15. Citovsky, V., G. De Vos, and P. Zambryski. 1988. Single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by the virE locus of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedScience 240: 501-504.undefinedundefined
16. Citovsky, V., B. Guralnick, M.N. Simon, and J.S. Wall. 1997. The molecular structure of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirE2-single stranded DNA complexes involved in nuclear import. undefinedundefinedJ. Mol. Biol. 271: 718-727.undefinedundefined
17. Citovsky, V., D. Knorr, G. Schuster, and P. Zambryski. 1990. The P30 movement protein of tobacco mosaic virus is a single-strand nucleic acid binding protein. undefinedundefinedCell 60: 637-647.undefinedundefined
18. Citovsky, V., D. Warnick, and P. Zambryski. 1994. Nuclear import of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirD2 and VirE2 proteins in maize and tobacco. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 91: 3210-3214.undefinedundefined
19. Citovsky, V., M.L. Wong, and P. Zambryski. 1989. Cooperative interaction of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirE2 protein with single stranded DNA: Implications for the T-DNA transfer process. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 1193-1197.undefinedundefined
20. Citovsky, V., J. Zupan, D. Warnick, and P. Zambryski. 1992. Nuclear localization of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirE2 protein in plant cells. undefinedundefinedScience 256: 1802-1805.undefinedundefined
21. Daniel, P.P. and J.A Bryant. 1988. DNA ligase in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings--changes in activity during germination and effects of deoxyribonucleotides. undefinedundefinedJ. Exp. Bot. 39: 481-486. undefinedundefined
22. Davies, C., D. Howard, G. Tam, and N. Wong. 1994. Isolation of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana mutants hypersensitive to gamma radiation. undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 243: 660-665.undefinedundefined
23. de la Cruz, F. and E. Lanka. 1998. In H. Spaink, P. Hooykaas and A. Kondorosi (eds.), Function of the Ti-plasmid Vir proteins: T-complex formation and transfer to the plant cell. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 281-301.undefinedundefined
24. Ding, L, and J.-K. Zhu. 1997. A role for arabinogalactan-proteins in root epidermal cell expansion. undefinedundefinedPlanta 203: 289-294.undefinedundefined
25. Errampalli, D., D. Patton, L. Castle, L. Mickelson, K. Hansen, J. Schnall, K. Feldmann, and D. Meinke. 1991. Embryonic lethals and T-DNA insertional mutagenesis in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis.undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 3: 149-157.undefinedundefined
26. Feldmann, K.A. . 1991. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis: Mutational spectrum. undefinedundefinedPlant J. 1: 71-82.undefinedundefined
27. Feldmann, K.A. and M.D. Marks. 1987. Agrobacterium-mediated transfomation of germinating seeds of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana: a non-tissue culture approach. undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 208: 1-9.undefinedundefined
28. Fields, S. and O.-K. Song. 1989. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. undefinedundefinedNature 340: 245-246.undefinedundefined
29. Filichkin, S.A. and S.B. Gelvin. 1993. Formation of a putative relaxation intermediate during T-DNA processing directed by the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens VirD1, D2 endonuclease. undefinedundefinedMol. Microbiol. 8: 915-926.undefinedundefined
30. Fullner, K., J.C. Lara, and E.W. Nester. 1996. Pilus assembly by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-DNA transfer genes. undefinedundefinedScience 273: 1107-1109.undefinedundefined
31. Gheysen, G., R. Villarroel, and M. Van Montagu. 1991. Illegitimate recombination in plants: a model for T-DNA integration. undefinedundefinedGenes Develop. 5: 287-297.undefinedundefined
32. Ghoshroy, S. and V Citovsky. 1998. Preservation of plant cell ultrastructure during immunolocalization of virus particles. undefinedundefinedJ. Virol. Methods 74: 223-229.undefinedundefined
33. Gietl, C., Z. Koukolikova-Nicola, and B. Hohn. 1987. Mobilization of T-DNA from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium to plant cells involves a protein that binds single-stranded DNA. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 9006-9010.undefinedundefined
34. Gorlich, D., and I.W. Mattaj. 1996. Nucleocytoplasmic transport. undefinedundefinedScience 271: 1513-1518.undefinedundefined
35. Guralnick, B., G. Thomsen, and V. Citovsky. 1996. Transport of DNA into the nuclei of Xenopus oocytes by a modified VirE2 protein of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium.undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 8: 363-373.undefinedundefined
36. Hicks, G.R., H.M.S. Smith, S. Lobreaux, and N.V. Raikhel. 1996. Nuclear import in permeabilized protoplasts from higher plants has unique features. undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 8: 1337-1352.undefinedundefined
37. Howard, E. and V. Citovsky. 1990. The emerging structure of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-DNA transfer complex. undefinedundefinedBioEssays 12: 103-108.undefinedundefined
38. Howard, E.A., J.R. Zupan, V. Citovsky, and P.C. Zambryski. 1992. The VirD2 protein of undefinedundefinedA. tumefaciens contains a C-terminal bipartite nuclear localization signal: Implications for nuclear uptake of DNA in plant cells. undefinedundefinedCell 68: 109-118.undefinedundefined
39. Ishida, Y., H. Saito, S. Ohta, Y. Hiei, T. Komari, and T. Kumashiro. 1996. High efficiency transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) mediated by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedNature Biotech. 14: 745-750.undefinedundefined
40. Jasper, F., C. Koncz, J. Schell, and H.H. Steinbiss. 1994. undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-strand production in vitro: Sequence-specific cleavage and 5' protection of single-stranded DNA templates by purified VirD2 protein. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 694-698.undefinedundefined
41. Kawahire, S., T. Tachibana, M. Umemoto, Y. Yoneda, N. Imai, M. Saito, T. Ichimura, S. Omata, and T. Horigome. 1996. Subcellular distribution and phosphorylation of the nuclear localization signal binding protein NBP60. undefinedundefinedExp. Cell Res. 222: 385-394. undefinedundefined
42. Koncz, C., N. Nemeth, G.P. Redei, and J. Schell. 1992. T-DNA insertional mutagenesis in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis.undefinedundefinedPlant Mol. Biol. 20: 963-976.undefinedundefined
43. Koukolikova-Nicola, Z. and B. Hohn. 1993. How does the T-DNA of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens find its way into the plant cell nucleus? .undefinedundefined Biochimie 75: 635-638.undefinedundefined
44. Koukolikova-Nicola, Z., D. Raineri, K. Stephens, C. Ramos, B. Tinland, E.W. Nester, and B. Hohn. 1993. Genetic analysis of the virD operon of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens: A search for functions involved in transport of T-DNA into the plant cell nucleus and in T-DNA integration . undefinedundefinedJ. Bacteriol. 175: 723.undefinedundefined
45. Krysan, P.J., J.C. Young, F. Tax, and M.R. Sussman. 1996. Identification of transferred DNA insertions within undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes involved in signal transduction and ion transport. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 93: 8145-8150.undefinedundefined
46. Kuldau, G.A., G. De Vos, J. Owen, G. McCaffrey, and P. Zambryski. 1990. The virB operon of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens pTiC58 encodes 11 open reading frames. undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 221: 256-266.undefinedundefined
47. Kussel, P and M. Frasch. 1995. Yeast Srp1, a nuclear protein related to Drosophila and mouse pendulin, is required for normal migration, division, and integrity of nuclei during mitosis. undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 248: 351-363.undefinedundefined
48. Lai, E.-M. and C.I. Kado. 1998. Processed VirB2 is the major subunit of the promiscuous pilus of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedJ. Bacteriol. 180: 2711-2717. undefinedundefined
49. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. undefinedundefinedNature 277: 680-685.undefinedundefined
50. Liang, P., and A.B. Pardee. 1992. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. undefinedundefinedScience 257: 967-971.undefinedundefined
51. Lister, C., and C. Dean. 1993. Recombinant inbred lines for mapping RFLP and phenotypic markers in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana.undefinedundefinedPlant J. 4: 745-750.undefinedundefined
52. Liu, C.-N., X.-Q. Li, and S.B. Gelvin. 1992. Multiple copies of virG enhance the transient transformation of celery, carrot, and rice tissues by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedPlant Mol. Biol. 20: 1071-1087.undefinedundefined
53. Loeb, J.D.J., G. Schlenstedt, D. Pellman, D. Kornitzer, A. P. Silver, and G.R. Fink. 1995. The yeast nuclear import receptor is required for mitosis. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7647-7651.undefinedundefined
54. Marton, L., M. Hrouda, A. Pecsvaradi, and M. Czako. 1994. T-DNA-independent mutations induced in transformed plant cells during undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium co-cultivation. undefinedundefinedTransgenic Res. 3: 317-325.undefinedundefined
55. Masson J.E., P.J. King, and J. Paszkowski. 1997. Mutants of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thalianahypersensitive to DNA-damaging treatments. undefinedundefinedGenetics 146: 401-407.undefinedundefined
56. Matsumoto, S., Y. Ito, T. Hosoi, Y. Takahashi, and Y. Machida. 1990. Integration of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-DNA into a tobacco chromosome: Possible involvement of DNA homology between T-DNA and plant DNA . undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 224: 309-316.undefinedundefined
57. Mayerhofer, R., Z. Koncz-Kalman, C. Nawrath, G. Bakkeren, A. Cramer, K. Angelis, G.P. Redei, J. Schell, B. Hohn, and C. Koncz. 1991. T-DNA integration: A mode of illegitimate recombination in plants . undefinedundefinedEMBO J. 10: 697-704.undefinedundefined
58. McLean, B.G., J. Zupan, and P. Zambryski. 1995. Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein associates with the cytoskeleton in tobacco cells. undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 7: 2101-2114.undefinedundefined
59. Merkle, T., D. Lecrec, C. Marshallsay, and F. Nagy. 1996. A plant in vitro system for the nuclear import of proteins. undefinedundefinedPlant J. 10: 1177-1186.undefinedundefined
60. Merrihew, R.V., K. Marburger, S.L Pennington, D.B. Roth, and J.H. Wilson. 1996. High-frequency illegitimate integration of transfected DNA at preintegrated target sites in a mammalian genome. undefinedundefinedMol. Cell. Biol. 16: 10-18.undefinedundefined
61. Mindrinos, M., F. Katagiri, G.-L. Yu, and F.M. Ausubel. 1994. The undefinedundefinedA. thaliana disease resistance gene RPS2 encodes a protein containing a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats. undefinedundefinedCell 78: 1089-1099.undefinedundefined
62. Minet, M., M.E. Dufour, and F. Lacroute. 1992. Complementation of Saccharomyces cervisiae auxotrophic mutants by undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana cDNAs. undefinedundefinedPlant J. 2: 417-422.undefinedundefined
63. Mysore, K.S., B. Bassuner, X.-b. Deng, N.S. Darbinian, A. Motchoulski, W. Ream, and S.B. Gelvin. 1998. Role of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens VirD2 protein in T-DNA transfer and integration. undefinedundefinedMol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 11: 668-683.undefinedundefined
64. Nam, J., A.G. Matthysse, and S.B. Gelvin. 1997. Differences in susceptibility of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis ecotypes to crown gall disease may result from a deficiency in T-DNA integration. undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 9: 317-333.undefinedundefined
65. Nam, J., K.S. Mysore, C. Zheng, M. Knue, A.G. Matthysse, and S.B Gelvin. 1999. Identification of T-DNA tagged undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants that are resistant to undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation. undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. In press.undefinedundefined
66. Napoli, C., C. Lemieux, and R. Jorgensen. 1990. Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into Petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans. undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 2: 279-289.undefinedundefined
67. Narasimhulu, S.B., X.-B. Deng, R. Sarria, and S.B. Gelvin. 1996. Early transcription of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-DNA genes in tobacco and maize. undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 8: 873-886.undefinedundefined
68. Ni, M., D. Cui, J. Einstein, S. Narasimhulu, C.E. Vergara, and S.B. Gelvin. 1995. Strength and tissue specificity of chimeric promoters derived from the octopine and mannopine synthase genes. undefinedundefinedPlant J. 7: 661-676.undefinedundefined
69. Offringa, R., M.J. de Groot, H.J. Haagsman, M.P. Does, P.J. van den Elzen, and P.J. Hooykaas. 1990. Extrachromosomal homologous recombination and gene targeting in plant cells after undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium mediated transformation. undefinedundefinedEMBO J. 9: 3077-3084.undefinedundefined
70. Ohba, T., Y. Yoshioka, C. Machida, and Y. Machida. 1995. DNA rearrangement associated with the integration of T-DNA in tobacco: An example for multiple duplications of DNA around the integration target. undefinedundefinedPlant J. 7: 157-164.undefinedundefined
71. Otten, L., H. DeGreve, J. Leemans, R. Hain, P. Hooykaas, and J. Schell. 1984. Restoration of virulence of vir region mutants of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens strain B6S3 by coinfection with normal and mutant undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium strains. undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 195: 159-163.undefinedundefined
72. Pansegrau, W., F. Schoumacher, B. Hohn, and E. Lanka. 1993. Site-specific cleavage and joining of single-stranded DNA by VirD2 protein of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmids: Analogy to bacterial conjugation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 11538-11542.undefinedundefined
73. Paszkowski, J., M. Baur, A. Bogucki, and I. Potrykus. 1988. Gene targeting in plants. undefinedundefinedEMBO J. 7: 4021-4026.undefinedundefined
74. Pear, J.R., Y. Kawagoe, W.E. Schreckengost, D.P. Delmer, and D.M. Stalker. 1996. Higher plants contain homologs of the bacterial celA genes encoding the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. undefinedundefinedProc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12637-12642.undefinedundefined
75. Regensburg-Tuink, A.J.G. and P.J.J. Hooykaas. 1993. Transgenic N. glauca plants expressing bacterial virulence gene virF are converted into hosts for nopaline strains of undefinedundefinedA. tumefaciens. undefinedundefinedNature 363: 69-71.undefinedundefined
76. Reiter, R.S., J.G.K. Williams, K.A. Feldmann, J.A. Rafalski, S.V. Tingey, and P.A.Scolnik. 1992. Global and local genome mapping in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana by using recombinant inbred lines and random amplified polymorphic DNAs. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 1477-1481.undefinedundefined
77. Relic, B., M. Andjelkovic, L. Rossi, Y. Nagamine, and B. Hohn. 1998. Interaction of the DNA modifying proteins VirD1 and VirD2 of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens: Analysis by subcellular localization in mammalian cells. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 95: 9105-9110.undefinedundefined
78. Ritchie, S.W., C.-N. Liu, J.C. Sellmer, H. Kononowicz, T.K. Hodges, and S.B. Gelvin. 1993. undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated expression of gusA in maize tissues. undefinedundefinedTransgenic Res. 2: 252-265.undefinedundefined
79. Roe, J.L, C.J. Rivin, R.A. Sessions, K.A. Feldmann, and P. Zambryski. 1993. The tousled gene in undefinedundefinedA. thaliana encodes a protein kinase homolog that is required for leaf and flower development. undefinedundefinedCell 75: 939-950.undefinedundefined
80. Rong, L., S.J. Karcher, and S.B. Gelvin. 1991. Genetic and molecular analyses of picA, a plant-inducible locus on the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens chromosome. undefinedundefinedJ. Bacteriol. 173: 5110-5120.undefinedundefined
81. Rong, L., S.J. Karcher, K. O'Neal, M.C. Hawes, C.D. Yerkes, R.K. Jayaswal, C.A. Hallberg, and S.B. Gelvin. 1990. picA, a novel plant-inducible locus on the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens chromosome. undefinedundefinedJ. Bacteriol. 172: 5828-5836. undefinedundefined
82. Rossi, L., B. Hohn, and B. Tinland. 1993. The VirD2 protein of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens carries nuclear localization signals important for transfer of T-DNA to plants . undefinedundefinedMol. Gen. Genet. 239: 345.undefinedundefined
83. Rossi, L., B. Hohn, and B. Tinland. 1996. Integration of complete transferred DNA units is dependent on the activity of virulence E2 protein of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 93: 126-130.undefinedundefined
84. Ruan, Y., J. Gilmore, and T. Conner. 1998. Towards undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genome analysis: Monitoring expression profiles of 1400 genes using cDNA microarrays. undefinedundefinedPlant J. 15: 821-833.undefinedundefined
85. Salomon, S. and H. Puchta. 1998. Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic cells. undefinedundefinedEMBO J. 17: 6086-6095.undefinedundefined
86. Schlenstedt, G., E. Hurt, V. Doye, and P. Silver. 1993. Reconstitutuion of nuclear protein transport with semi-intact yeast cells. undefinedundefinedJ. Cell Biol. 123: 785-798.undefinedundefined
87. Schrammeijer, B., J. Hemelaar, and P.J.J. Hooykaas. 1998. The presence and characterization of a virF gene on undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium vitis Ti plasmids. undefinedundefinedMol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 11: 429-433.undefinedundefined
88. Sen, P., G. J. Pazour, D. Anderson, and A. Das. 1989. Cooperative binding of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens VirE2 protein to single-stranded DNA. undefinedundefinedJ. Bacteriol. 171: 2573-80.undefinedundefined
89. Shen, W.-H., J. Escudero, M Schlappi, C. Ramos, B. Hohn, and Z. Koukolikova-Nicola. 1993. T-DNA transfer to maize cells: Histochemical investigation of b-glucuronidase activity in maize tissues. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 1488-1492.undefinedundefined
90. Shen, W.H. and C. Gigot. 1997. Protein complexes binding to cis elements of the plant histone gene promoters: multiplicity, phosphorylation and cell cycle alteration. undefinedundefinedPlant Mol. Biol. 33: 367-379.undefinedundefined
91. Sheng, J. and V. Citovsky. 1996. Agrobacterium-plant cell DNA transport: Have virulence proteins, will travel. undefinedundefinedPlant Cell 8: 1699-1710.undefinedundefined
92. Shirasu, K. and C.I. Kado. 1993. Membrane location of the Ti plasmid VirB proteins involved in the biosynthesis of a pilin-like conjugative structure on undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens.undefinedundefinedFEMS Microbiol. Lett. 111: 287-294.undefinedundefined
93. Shurvinton, C.E., L. Hodges, and W. Ream. 1992. A nuclear localization signal and the C-terminal omega sequence in the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tuemfaciens VirD2 endonuclease are important for tumor formation. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 89: 11837-11841.undefinedundefined
94. Stachel, S.E., B. Timmerman, and P. Zambryski. 1986. Generation of single-stranded T-DNA molecules during the initial stages of T-DNA transfer from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells. undefinedundefinedNature (London) 322: 706-712.undefinedundefined
95. Thompson, D.V., L.S. Melchers, K.B. Idler, R.A. Schilperoort, and P.J.J. Hooykaas. 1988. Analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens virB operon. undefinedundefinedNuc. Acids Res. 16: 4621-4636.undefinedundefined
96. Tinland, B., Z. Koukolikova-Nicola, M.N. Hall, and B. Hohn. 1992. The T-DNA-linked VirD2 protein contains two distinct functional nuclear localization signals . undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 89: 7442-7446.undefinedundefined
97. Tinland, B., F. Schoumacher, V. Gloeckler, A.M. Bravo-Angel, and B. Hohn. 1995. The undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens virulence D2 protein is responsible for precise integration of T-DNA into the plant genome. undefinedundefinedEMBO J. 14: 3585-3595.undefinedundefined
98. Tomkinson, A.E. and D.S. Levin. 1997. Mammalian DNA ligases. undefinedundefinedBioEssays 19: 893-901.undefinedundefined
99. Van Lijsebettens, M., R. Vanderhaeghen, and M. Van Montagu. 1991. Insertional mutagenesis in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana: Isolation ofa T-DNA linked mutation that alters leaf morphology. undefinedundefinedTheor. Appl. Genet. 2: 277-284.undefinedundefined
100. Wada, T., T. Tachibana, Y. Shimura, and K. Okada. 1997. Epidermal cell differentiation in undefinedundefinedArabidopsis determined by a Myb homolog, CPC. undefinedundefinedScience 277: 1113-1116.undefinedundefined
101. Ward, J.E., D.E. Akiyoshi, D. Regier, A. Datta, M.P. Gordon, and E.W. Nester. 1988. Characterization of the virB operon from an undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid . undefinedundefinedJ. Biol. Chem. 263: 5804-5814.undefinedundefined
102. Weis, K., I. W. Mattaj, and A.I. Lamond. 1995. Identification of hSRP1a as a functional receptor for nuclear localization sequences. undefinedundefinedScience 268: 1049-1053.undefinedundefined
103. Winans, S.C. . 1992. Two-way chemical signaling in Agrobacterium-plant interactions. undefinedundefinedMicrobiol. Rev. 56: 12-31.undefinedundefined
104. Yusibov, V.M., T.R. Steck, V. Gupta, and S.B. Gelvin. 1994. Association of single-stranded transferred DNA from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium tumefaciens with tobacco cells. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 91: 2994-2998.undefinedundefined
105. Zambryski, P.C. 1992. Chronicles from the Agrobacterium-plant cell DNA transfer story. undefinedundefinedAnnu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43: 465-490.undefinedundefined
106. Ziemienowicz A., B. Tinland, J. Bryant, V. Gloeckler, and B. Hohn. Plant enzymes but not undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirD2 mediate T-DNA ligation in vitro. In preparation. 107. Zupan, J.R., V. Citovsky, and P. Zambryski. 1996. undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirE2 protein mediates nuclear uptake of single-stranded DNA in plant cells. undefinedundefinedProc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 93: 2392-2397.undefinedundefined
108. Zupan, J.R., and Zambryski, P. 1995. Transfer of T-DNA from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium to the plant cell. undefinedundefinedPlant Physiol. 107: 1041-1047.undefinedundefined
109. Zupan, J., and P. Zambryski. 1997. The undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium DNA transfer complex. undefinedundefinedCrit. Rev. Plant Science16: 279-295.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedA. Current Activitiesundefinedundefined

          My laboratory uses plant systems to study two basic biological processes: (i) undefinedundefinednuclear import and (ii) undefinedundefinedvirus-host interactions.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedI. Transport of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-DNA into the host cell nucleus as an experimental model for plant nuclear importundefinedundefined. Nuclear traffic of macromolecules is a basic cellular process in all eukaryotic organisms. We study nuclear uptake in plants using Agrobacterium-plant cell interaction during which bacterial T-DNA-protein complexes (T-complexes) are imported into the host cell nucleus. Since pathogenic microorganisms often adapt existing cellular machinery for their own needs, undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium likely employs an endogenous cellular pathway for nuclear import and, thus, represents a convenient experimental system for nuclear transport of both nucleic acid and protein molecules. Our studies have identified two undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium proteins, VirD2 and VirE2, which form a complex with the transported T-DNA and target it to and through the nuclear pore. We have also shown that while VirD2 localizes to the cell nucleus both in plant and animal systems, the nuclear targeting activity of VirE2 is plant-specific. Rearrangement of a single amino acid residue in this plant-specific nuclear localization signal (NLS) of VirE2 enables it to function in animal cells, efficiently delivering DNA molecules into their nuclei. Currently, we are identifying and characterizing host plant proteins that interact with undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium VirD2 and VirE2. For example, we have cloned an undefinedundefinedArabidopsis gene coding for an NLS-binding protein, AtKAPa, which is directly involved in VirD2 nuclear import.undefinedundefined
          In addition to the undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium T-complex nuclear import, we are investigating a specific case of nuclear transport of the tomato yellow leaf curl geminivirus (TYLCV) which is a major pathogen of tomato plants. In international collaboration with Dr. Gafni (Volcani Center, Israel), we have shown that TYLCV coat protein carries a functional NLS and is likely involved in nuclear targeting of the viral genomic DNA.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedII. Plant-virus interactions: Viral cell-to-cell and systemic movement and development of viral disease. Plant intercellular communication largely occurs via cell-to-cell connections, the plasmodesmata (PD). As an experimental system to study PD transport and regulation, we are using cell-to-cell movement proteins of plant viruses as which interact with PD to increase their size exclusion limit. Thus, these proteins are utilized as tools to identify their cellular receptors involved in PD transport. In addition, we have isolated a mutant of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana, a genetic model plant, which is defective in viral systemic movement and, by implication, in PD transport. This mutant, designated vsm1, is used to elucidate the molecular pathways for viral systemic spread. Finally, we are isolating undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants with alterations in viral disease symptoms. One such mutant, vid1, is indistinguishable from the wild-type plants when healthy but develops a severely dwarfed phenotype with loss of apical dominance when infected. The study of vid1 plants may help to better understand the mechanisms of formation of plant viral disease symptoms.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedB. Relationship to the Proposed Projectundefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

          There is a "feedback" relationship between the proposed project and my current research. First, the proposal is directly related to my ongoing T-DNA nuclear import project, benefiting from our experience in this field. undefinedundefinedThe proposed research builds on my long-term experience in the biochemical, molecular, and cellular aspects of DNA transfer from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium to plant cellsundefinedundefined. In addition, the proposed project takes advantage of my general expertise in plant-pathogen interactions, such as identification of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants with altered symptoms of viral disease and/or resistance to viral systemic movement. Our work on these projects has provided my research group with experience in confocal and electron microscopy, microinjection, yeast two-hybrid system, in vitro nuclear import, protein-DNA interaction, and genetic screening for undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants and mapping of the identified mutations. These approaches also represent the major technical tools for the proposed research.undefinedundefined
          Second, the proposed collaborative project will in turn enhance my entire research program. It will provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium infection which most likely may be applied to other cases of plant-pathogen interactions, such as viral infection, another major focus of my current research.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

          My laboratory studies the initial events of Agrobacterium-plant interactions, including T-DNA and VirE2 transport from the bacterium, bacterial attachment to the plant cell, nuclear targeting of the T-complex, and T-DNA integration into the plant genome. Also, we are examining the use of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation for homologous and site-directed insertion of T-DNA into the plant genome, and the activity of novel "artificial" promoters constructed using T-DNA promoters and transcriptional activating elements. undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedI. Mechanism of oncogenic suppression of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium by the plasmid pSaundefinedundefined. When coresidient with the Ti-plasmid in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium, the IncW plasmid pSa inhibits tumorigenesis (oncogenic suppression, OS). A single gene of pSa, osa (oncogenic suppressive activity) is sufficient to effect oncogenic suppression. We have recently determined that the molecular mechanism of OS involves inhibition by osa of VirE2 export from undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium, but not T-DNA export. In addition, pSa can inhibit the conjugal transfer of the IncQ plasmid RSF1010 between undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium cells. Our data indicate that osa interacts with the VirB/VirD4 transport apparatus to inhibit conjugal transfer (fertility inhibition) and to cause OS. We are determining the component of the this transport apparatus with which Osa protein interacts. undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedII. Identification of plant proteins that interact with Vir protein nuclear transport signals, and the regulation of T-complex nuclear transport. We have used a yeast two-hybrid system to identify a plant type 2C protein phosphatase (PP2C) that interacts specifically with the nuclear localization signal (NLS) of VirD2 protein. An undefinedundefinedArabidopsis PP2C mutant (abi1) shows increased levels of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformation. This PP2C negatively regulates nuclear import of VirD2 protein, and hence the T-complex, by dephosphorylating a serine residue adjacent to the VirD2 NLS. Alteration of this serine residue to an alanine decreases VirD2 nuclear import and transformation of plant cells by undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium. We are currently investigating the kinase that is responsible for phosphorylation of this serine, and thus potentiating T-complex nuclear transport.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedIII. Determination of the relative contributions of VirD2 and VirE2 NLSs to T-complex nuclear transport. We can generate "artificial T-complexes" by cleaving fluorescently-labeled single-stranded DNA molecules containing a T-DNA border with VirD2 protein in vitro. These DNA/VirD2 complexes can be coated with VirE2 protein in vitro. By microinjecting fluorescently-labeled T-complexes containing wild-type or mutant VirD2 NLSs into plant cells, we are currently measuring the relative contributions of the VirD2 and the VirE2 NLSs to the rate and extent of T-complex nuclear import.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedIV. Identification of undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutants and genes involved in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium transformationundefinedundefined. We are currently screening various T-DNA tagged undefinedundefinedArabidopsis collections for rat (undefinedundefinedresistant to undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium undefinedundefinedtransformation) mutants. Most of the currently-identified mutants are blocked at an early stage of the transformation process (i.e., bacterial attachment, T-complex transport to the plant, or T-complex nuclear transport). Some mutants are blocked in T-DNA integration into the plant genome. Isolation of T-DNA/plant DNA junction fragments and the corresponding undefinedundefinedArabidopsis cDNA and genomic clones has resulted in the identification of several plant genes involved in undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium attachment (an arabinogalactan protein, a cellulose synthase-like protein, and a wall protein) and in T-DNA integration (a histone H2A protein and a myb-like transcription factor).undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedV. Generation of novel promoters useful for plant genetic engineering. We have constructed a strong promoter (the "super-promoter") from transcriptional regulatory elements of the octopine synthase and mannopine synthase 2' genes. We are currently concluding an analyis of the strengths of this promoter in monocots and dicot plant species.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedB. Relationship to the Proposed Projectundefinedundefined

          The major current goal of research in my laboratory is to identify plant components necessary for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and to utilize this information to genetically manipulate currently recalcitrant plant species so that they can more readily be transformed. The proposed project greatly enhances my capabilities to achieve these goals by providing the resources (both financial and the benefits of a collaboration with experts in the field) to extend these investigations. Studies of plant genes regulated during the early stages of transformation and plant proteins that interact with Vir proteins will provide information to perform reverse genetic analysis of mutant plants to determine the roles of these genes and proteins in the transformation process. The identification of rat mutants will complement these efforts by directly providing information about specific genes and their functions in transformation. undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedA. Current Activitiesundefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedI. Transfer and Integration of T-DNA. Interaction of undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium with plants is a fascinating research topic as a whole, yet we now concentrate on work analyzing the fate of T-DNA in the plant. The specific steps currently worked on are import of T-DNA into plant nuclei and integration of T-DNA. Precise integration of T-DNA is dependent on both virulence proteins VirD2 and VirE2. In the absence of functional versions of these proteins transfer is inefficient, nuclear import is severely reduced and integration of a low level of truncated versions of T-DNA is detected only. Current activities focus on in vitro analysis of T-DNA integration, using model targets and model T-DNAs.undefinedundefined

          undefinedundefinedII. Homologous recombination in plants. Using transgenic undefinedundefinedArabidopsis thaliana and tobacco plants which allow quantitative determination of intrachromosomal homologous recombination we analyze influences of known mutations in various pathways on recombination. Also environmental effects, biotic and abiotic in nature, on homologous recombination are being studied.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedB. Relationship to the Proposed Projectundefinedundefined

          The proposed work will be of mutual benefit. The planned collaborative research will profit from my long-term experience in Agrobacterium-plant interaction on a mostly molecular-biological level. Likewise, homologous recombination is an area new for my prospective collaborators and the project integrates this work. Constructs, assays, plants and an enthusiastic personal environment (over the distance or in our institute) will be available to anybody in the project.undefinedundefined
          Conversely, the projected work, being to a good proportion a direct extension of ongoing work at our laboratory in Basel, will provide new dimensions in our thinking on undefinedundefinedAgrobacterium and plants.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

          None of the data, bacterial strains, plasmids, genes, or mutants that we generate during the course of this project will be considered proprietary. We shall immediately deposit all information obtained during the course of this work in the appropriate data bases (e.g., GeneBank, undefinedundefinedArabidopsis mutant data base, or the web site that we shall establish). We shall freely distribute all data, bacterial strains, plasmids, genes, mutants, etc. generated during the course of this work.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedA. Management and Collaborationundefinedundefined

          The logistics of the proposed collaboration is clear. It will be performed on three levels. undefinedundefinedFirst, all three labs will be in constant electronic communication to exchange up-to-date information on the ongoing experiments. Each time a significant discovery is made (e.g. a new host factor or biological activity is identified), we will arrange for a three-way telephone conference calls to interpret the experimental results, plan our subsequent experiments, and prepare publications and presentations of the obtained data. Once a year, the PI and two co-PIs will personally meet in one of the labs for extensive and comprehensive discussions and planning.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedSecond, each laboratory will be assigned a specific task of conducting experimentation in its area of expertise. undefinedundefinedArabidopsis genes, proteins, and mutant plants will be shipped from the lab in which they had been identified to the designated lab best suited to assay their biological function. For example, VirD2- and VirE2-interacting proteins isolated in the Citovsky lab will be shipped to the Gelvin lab to be tested for their role in nuclear import in plant protoplasts and to the Hohn lab to be tested for their involvement in T-DNA integration. Or, rat mutants deficient for transient T-DNA expression identified in the Gelvin lab will be sent to the Citovsky lab where they will be examined for the presence of AtKAPalpha and other factors required for VirD2 and VirE2 nuclear import.undefinedundefined
          undefinedundefinedThird, in case of especially laborious experiments, several laboratories will share the same experimental load. For example, both Gelvin and Citovsky labs are experienced in genetic approaches to Arabidopsis-pathogen interactions; thus, the genetic screening rat mutants and subsequent cloning of the T-DNA tagged RAT genes will be performed in both laboratories simultaneously. To further facilitate the exchange of laboratory expertise, postdoctoral associates from each group will travel to other sister-labs to perform collaborative experiments and learn new experimental approaches.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedB. Training And Diversityundefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

          The Molecular and Cellular Biology (MCB) Training Program run by the Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology is the major multidisciplinary, inter-departmental graduate program in the biological sciences at SUNY, Stony Brook. The Program is supported by the NIH Training Grant #GM08468 and includes faculty members from Stony Brook, Cold Spring Harbor, and Brookhaven National Laboratory. Thus, the MCB graduate students have access to the intellectual resources and infrastructural facilities of these three leading research institutions. On average, the MCB program receives between 250-300 applications a year which result in an entering class of 20 students. A notable aspect of this recruitment is the increased success of minority recruiting. Last year, for example, 8 minority students were interviewed, resulting in extending offers to 4 of these students.undefinedundefined
          To enhance further minority recruitment, the MCB program wrote a proposal for federal Fellowships (Title IX-B) for underrepresented minority students and was one of only three programs on campus to receive a Patricia Roberts Harris Fellowship for an incoming student in The Program. The MCB program also is represented at the NIGMS Minority Programs Symposium in Washington, D.C. The MCB program has established a relationship with the Minority Apprenticeship Program (M-RAP). During summers, several M-RAP students, who are biology/biochemistry undergraduates in other institutions, work in MCB members' laboratories. Also, the MCB program has close ties to the Biology department of Hunter College of the City University of New York which is the focus of the minority students of the CUNY system. These relationships with M-RAP and CUNY students allow the MCB program to attract and recruit the minority students from nationwide as well as from the New York Metropolitan area. Finally, our we routinely solicit applications from the students participating in the MBRS and MARC programs and students listed on the Minority Locator Service.undefinedundefined
          All of the MCB minority students are recipients of W. Burghart Turner Graduate Fellowships awarded competitively by the State of New York. In addition, one of the MCB minority students was recently awarded a Howard Hughes Predoctoral Fellowship, further attesting to the high quality of minority students in the Program. Besides W. Burghart Turner and Howard Hughes Predoctoral Fellowships, the MCB graduate students can apply for an Institute of Cell and Developmental Biology (ICDB) Predoctoral Fellowship which is funded by pharmaceutical and biotech firms.undefinedundefined
          In addition to this major effort by the MCB program to recruit minority graduate students, the co-PI (VC) himself is actively seeking postdoctoral trainees from the underrepresented ethnic/racial groups. For example, Dr. Robert Lartey, an African-American, was successfully recruited to join this co-PI's lab. During his three-year postdoctoral training, Dr. Lartey published in leading plant biology journals and was supported by a minority postdoctoral grant from the NIH. undefinedundefined
          Once the minority graduate students and postdocs are recruited to the co-PI's lab at Stony Brook, they take advantage of a very stimulating environment with faculty interests in such different fields as plant biology, neurobiology, Drosophila, Xenopus and mouse development, and yeast biology. In addition to the departmental structure, the co-PI's laboratory is a member of ICDB which includes a recently-awarded Howard Hughes funding. Both the Department and ICDB run weekly series of seminars that host prominent scientists from the US and abroad, including Nobel laureates and National Academy members. Importantly, plant biology represents a frequent topic of these lectures. In addition to the formal seminars and numerous journal clubs, ICDB supports an annual three day-long retreat in Shelter Island, NY, where faculty, postdocs and graduate students give informal talks and poster presentations, further fostering interaction and collaboration between labs in different fields of biology. Lastly, the proximity of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, which is a member of our graduate program, allows attendance of various courses and workshops as well as easy interaction with the CSH staff.undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

          Dr. Gelvin is a member of Department of Biological Sciences and the Interdisciplinary programs Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (BMB), Purdue Genetics Program (PGP), and Plant Biology Program (PBP). Each of these departments/programs has a strong plant biology component, including a large number of faculty who specialize in the area of plant genomics, and have consistently recruited excellent graduate students and postdoctoral research fellows in the area of plant biology. Students (and postdoctoral fellows) in these programs have the opportunity of enrolling in numerous courses in basic plant sciences, including plant molecular biology (taught by SBG), plant cell biology, plant growth and development, plant genetics and genomics, plant biochemistry, and numerous specialty courses in the applied and basic plant sciences. In addition to numerous journal clubs in various life science disciplines, including plant sciences, a group of approximately 10 plant cell and molecular biology laboratories (including SBG) holds weekly research conferences to acquaint members with ongoing research in each of the participating laboratories. These meetings are attended by 20-40 graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and research advisors. Many of these students are supported by a NSF Plant Genetics Training Grant or a USDA National Needs Training Grant. In addition to the numerous weekly seminar series in the life sciences, students and postdoctoral fellows are encouraged to attend the weekly Plant Cell and Molecular Biology Seminar series (established approximately 15 years ago). This seminar series brings national and international plant scientists to the campus, and first year students in the PBP are required to participate in a "student seminar course" revolving around this weekly seminar series.undefinedundefined
          Special efforts have been and continue to be made to recruit women and minority students and postdoctoral research fellows. Of the 436 applicants to the Department of Biological Sciences in 1997-1998, 37 (8.5%) were black, hispanic, or Asian/Pacific Island students. Of the currently enrolled 122 students in the department, 16 (13%) represent minority groups. These students are supported by NIH fellowships, a Biophysics Training Grant, Purdue University minority fellowships, and special Abbott, Genox, Indiana Elks Club, and Sloan Foundation Fellowships. 42% of the current Biology Ph.D. students are female. Over the past 5 years, the BMB program has enrolled 8 (of 74) minority students, and the smaller PGP and PBP programs enrolled 2 minority students (of 11 total students) in 1998. Purdue University maintains an active minority recruiting effort, including participation in summer MARC and AIM undergraduate research programs (SBG has participated in the MARC program, and successfully recruited a MARC student to his laboratory), and sending faculty to Traditional Minority Colleges to recruit graduate students. SBG has recently participated in this program and has recruited students from Tuskegee University. undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

          This project is not part of another national or international collaborative project. undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined(Return to top of document)undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

This work is made possible by a grant from the National Science Foundation's Plant Genome Research Program. undefinedundefined

For additional information about this research, contact:undefinedundefined
Dr. Stanton Gelvin (undefinedundefinedgelvin@bilbo.bio.purdue.edu)undefinedundefined
765/494-4939undefinedundefined
Department of Biological Sciencesundefinedundefined
Purdue Universityundefinedundefined
1392 Lilly Hallundefinedundefined
West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392undefinedundefined
undefinedundefined

Questions or Comments regarding this web site should be addressed to undefinedundefinedDr. Stanton Gelvinundefinedundefined

undefinedundefined

undefinedundefinedundefinedundefined